From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: staticpro everything Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 17:02:58 +0300 Message-ID: <86plu5ocj1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877cghc0yy.fsf@gmail.com> <86jzkhu5rv.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttjlabic.fsf@gmail.com> <87v8408wsr.fsf@gmail.com> <87o79sasl5.fsf@gmail.com> <87plu72y8h.fsf@gmail.com> <877cgfwe5g.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <871q6mptkj.fsf@gmail.com> <86frv2pse5.fsf@gnu.org> <87v83ynhuc.fsf@gmail.com> <86v83xof5w.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10029"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 01 16:06:27 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s2AbJ-0002La-LP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 May 2024 16:06:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s2AaF-000636-Mn; Wed, 01 May 2024 10:05:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s2AYA-0003rM-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2024 10:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s2AYA-0007ZC-Bw; Wed, 01 May 2024 10:03:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=UQLKdB2DoOu24zdiIqKGrhgmsJsDgdEXX73ojLLo2y8=; b=leltHA7KOf3PQ5Xf47kA 4vUDR8yjwK7PuicDC9FDAXJOKQ1fmy5zzQDmpsI8wat93r4qS5if0hn4ir6/WlT3NEKmFeisI/WFN MXQXqA6A1tFGaA/mg7K1PIfNP3UXb8ZHSLiZTlzkTV+8J9lhJ/QjjzlsS4NTQ9VGR6uXDK0+UuBTw In6uKVcLaIN8IYQLqegY3RErmYVJOHHjyh+EHEs/V9nuouxpjcZeYi2epQRY2SirL2s6jTEdXgu3e NcqAk5QFH+NAgigzBLmpeIIeBn6oj9UiVejjORjP0xpIpwrrHlpnuQyagLrV12knw/bgMa/CU4r1Y 2icApRrclXL7iA==; In-Reply-To: (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Wed, 01 May 2024 15:48:25 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:318479 Archived-At: > From: Gerd Möllmann > Cc: Helmut Eller , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 15:48:25 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > 'struct bidi_it' is a member of 'struct it', the iterator object we > > use to perform display layout of windows. 'struct it' includes > > pointers to the window being displayed and also to the frame of that > > window: > > > > struct it > > { > > /* The window in which we iterate over current_buffer (or a string). */ > > Lisp_Object window; > > struct window *w; > > > > /* The window's frame. */ > > struct frame *f; > > > > It also has a few other pointers. And yet, you didn't include 'struct > > it' in your list, and I wonder why the difference? (The pointer to > > the window is the same pointer that is copied in 'struct bidi_it'.) > > I think struct it always lives on the stack. In that case we don't need > to do anything (see my other mail). What a relief!