From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unexpected behavior of format-number with format-prompt Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:46:04 +0200 Message-ID: <86pln3ljz7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875xp0b00l.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> <86h68jqyut.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzdfp2zg.fsf@gmx.net> <86ses3p0c3.fsf@gnu.org> <87fro3ox37.fsf@gmx.net> <87v7ww6xi5.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> <87fro0t6sj.fsf@gmx.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30153"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: joseph@breatheoutbreathe.in, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 10 06:47:00 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tA0mq-0007ib-HN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 06:47:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tA0m6-0008Lp-0c; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 00:46:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tA0m0-0008LV-Hl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 00:46:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tA0lz-0004vA-08; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 00:46:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=nB1+dNQ9hcIxl/9kL1m/X+dzc/FHODvYe+nQU2jaHec=; b=S7eMbph62prd q8rvwOqaNbz5b1kIUEDPNFKXvJaHLyt8FP+d5ABOywEHdzZKjjS06cyiXUyedLWuXW0bSVjsg4GcR FE74/mcIGZKRkkHjZUIYK5FmaxCPMHCxJv019bb81IGf04XAcnYHgctMd1/4MX0DVIoOi3xxs2EyP Yc/pfpLeMee1n2lqmoL2uCx8oMWa/oV0SR60KYAaBrh5/6fSalDYXw7C/OFswyayYdzqq2oWyB7K8 9ohmDwPWkjL8AAysFSJCy6TluLXB9tqO38eH8JqZq6sJhO9Fs3vLKiuOn5XQcDyhhokEq3MKjkCr4 cuwDSM2Y+mirXOOZDjwRig==; In-Reply-To: <87fro0t6sj.fsf@gmx.net> (message from Stephen Berman on Sat, 09 Nov 2024 22:51:24 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325364 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 22:51:24 +0100 > > > I think we're better off documenting the idiosyncrasy in the > > `read-number' docstring as Eli suggested. > > That's certainly the path of least risk, though I can't think of a > plausible use where my patch would result in duplication in the prompt > string. Maybe so, but it's just too kludgey to my palate, sorry.