From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET Merge Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:25:47 -0600 Message-ID: <86o9z58jl0.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <87r348ul9n.fsf@gmail.com> <87lgugm2qg.fsf@gmail.com> <87inpelu8i.fsf@gmail.com> <837f5uajlk.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8aqlqz8.fsf@gmail.com> <8360leahxr.fsf@gnu.org> <8760lelq68.fsf@gmail.com> <83wpdt8yo2.fsf@gnu.org> <87inpd650y.fsf@gmail.com> <8660ldabje.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87r341v1ed.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484688370 27903 195.159.176.226 (17 Jan 2017 21:26:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:26:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (windows-nt) Cc: Edward John Steere , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Engster Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 17 22:26:06 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cTbGO-00069e-Cz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:25:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37763 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTbGT-0006uq-6N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:26:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40381) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTbGM-0006uk-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTbGJ-00079O-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:25:54 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp129.ord.emailsrvr.com ([173.203.6.129]:46931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTbGJ-000791-0r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:25:51 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp29.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp29.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 213A6A01BB; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:25:50 -0500 (EST) X-Auth-ID: board-president@tomahawk-creek-hoa.com Original-Received: by smtp29.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: board-president-AT-tomahawk-creek-hoa.com) with ESMTPSA id B288CA00CE; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:25:49 -0500 (EST) X-Sender-Id: board-president@tomahawk-creek-hoa.com Original-Received: from Takver4 (76-218-37-33.lightspeed.kscymo.sbcglobal.net [76.218.37.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:25:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r341v1ed.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:10:02 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 173.203.6.129 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211363 Archived-At: David Engster writes: > Stephen Leake writes: >> Edward John Steere writes: >> >>>> I understand that you've changed your merge strategy, so please tell >>>> if/when this becomes relevant again. >>>> >>>> Thanks for working on this. >>> >>> Correct. Thanks for your input anyway. Hopefully it wont take too long >>> before I have something to show for my efforts. >> >> I'd like to help with this. Perhaps doing some of the merge work, or by >> running tests; let me know. > > Actually, there's one thing which really didn't get much attention > during all those years: the texi files. I'm not sure how much those > diverged between Emacs and CEDET upstream. It was always messy, since in > the initial merge not all docs were imported from upstream. So if you'd > like to take a look at the texi files, that'd be much appreciated. Ok, I'll look at the texi files currently in SourceForge and Emacs CEDET, and make recommendations. -- -- Stephe