From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (elisp) Generic Functions cl-defmethod documentation bug? Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 16:57:29 -0600 Message-ID: <86o9ma4kkm.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <868tdhvgxs.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86k1x08jk0.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83bmicclii.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1515020391 25953 195.159.176.226 (3 Jan 2018 22:59:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 22:59:51 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (windows-nt) To: emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 03 23:59:47 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eWs0X-0005di-1N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 23:59:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40481 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eWs2U-0006KA-NA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 18:01:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eWryb-0003sd-MT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:57:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eWryX-0005oe-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:57:37 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp137.ord.emailsrvr.com ([173.203.6.137]:56156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eWryX-0005nd-E1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:57:33 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp22.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp22.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 598E220189 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:57:32 -0500 (EST) X-Auth-ID: board-president@tomahawk-creek-hoa.com Original-Received: by smtp22.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: board-president-AT-tomahawk-creek-hoa.com) with ESMTPSA id 190A0200B5 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:57:31 -0500 (EST) X-Sender-Id: board-president@tomahawk-creek-hoa.com Original-Received: from Takver4 (76-218-37-33.lightspeed.kscymo.sbcglobal.net [76.218.37.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:57:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83bmicclii.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:45:25 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 173.203.6.137 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221568 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Stephen Leake >> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 07:41:19 -0600 >>=20 >> Stefan Monnier writes: >>=20 >> >> =E2=80=98STRUCT-TAG=E2=80=99 >> >> The argument must be an instance of a class named STRUCT-TAG >> >> defined with =E2=80=98cl-defstruct=E2=80=99 (*note (cl)Stru= ctures::), or of >> >> one of its parent classes. >> >> >> >> Shouldn't 'parent classes' be 'child classes'? >> > >> > That sounds right, indeed. And instead of "tag" it should say "type" >> > since this is a type and not a tag. >>=20 >> Ok, committed in b6add8c7 > > Thanks, but why to master? Documentation patches should be pushed to > the release branch. Sorry, I realized that after I committed. I found instructions for backporting a commit in admin/notes/git-workflow: ------------- cd ~/emacs/emacs-26 git cherry-pick -xe b6add8c7... and add "Backport:" to the commit string.=20=20 git push ------------- is that the correct process? --=20 -- Stephe