From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#71386: 29.1; Frame is auto-deleted even when it has multiple tabs Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 21:28:17 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86o78ac6ny.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <86ikymipzx.fsf@gnu.org> <7269c7c4-86a1-44bf-8d5d-378c3584027a@gmx.at> <86zfrx8ec0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8561a63a-66d3-44cd-872f-73d26af7edbe@gmx.at> <86msnw4qm4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86y17gej2x.fsf@gnu.org> <86y17gmxdg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <868qzehxie.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86msnu9fhg.fsf@gnu.org> <86zfruc7qh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86ikyi9e2l.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="729"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, abdo.haji.ali@gmail.com, 71386@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 09 20:41:37 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sGNU0-000AdB-O0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 20:41:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGNTE-0002JX-0i; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 14:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGNTC-0002Ip-L4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 14:40:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sGNTC-0002X6-C1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 14:40:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGNTS-0000Ig-Ra for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 14:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2024 18:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71386 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 71386-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71386.17179584271004 (code B ref 71386); Sun, 09 Jun 2024 18:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 71386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2024 18:40:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGNSr-0000Fw-Nl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 14:40:27 -0400 Original-Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:42321) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sGNIn-0008Cw-5f for 71386@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2024 14:30:01 -0400 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8334A20002; Sun, 9 Jun 2024 18:29:17 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <86ikyi9e2l.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 09 Jun 2024 21:16:34 +0300") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:286966 Archived-At: >> I tried to improve these doc strings: > > Thanks, they are more clear now. But one point still needs > clarification, IMO: > >> +(defvar window-delete-frame-functions nil >> + "A list of functions to handle the frame deletion. >> +Each of functions is called with two arguments: FRAME and KILL where >> +KILL means the buffer shown in window will be killed. When one of functions > > So KILL is a boolean, and if it's non-nil, it means the buffer will be > killed? If so, will the buffer be killed even if the function returns > non-nil? I don't know, I just copied the text from the doc string of 'window--delete'. But I don't understand the logic of using the KILL argument in 'window--delete': (kill (delete-frame frame)) Maybe Martin could explain.