From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gap buffer problem? Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 18:58:49 +0200 Message-ID: <86o71i2m2e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86wmg7bso1.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyhzmzbp.fsf@telefonica.net> <87bjximwnj.fsf@protonmail.com> <87ttbal9qx.fsf@protonmail.com> <877c86l1aj.fsf@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6956"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ofv@wanadoo.es To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 11 17:59:33 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tLQ3g-0001bN-4E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 17:59:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLQ34-0004EK-Bs; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:58:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLQ33-0004EA-1J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:58:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tLQ31-0006Dj-UW; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:58:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=q4SjTqacqbvNEG+WGH8rsA87Itqq5Thkl90EHprOVe0=; b=qrYLSmeNDXAQyzWGW2Hh tu6og+G4w0ofF3fSmhHCe/PTcydvLbO2+FSbRikLb8vKAS55ZcHOKZ4XPaojShkMRgwn2vyuGjqnx 9pc+G7DWM6BgypeaTuSUrp2ePz5UiBCxuJU9TQAVfr34arGWtVh6exIZ9JyD4d2kOeFHKrdup4oz1 TPnfrWxw1IWZIf2t9XtbXjmaFQJAuOGdYRIafjMt/pmZtr9As3TD7/psg6boWO4gfV4heRclQMxo1 Df6qQI/3iSfcJYCoES0dgbaF17/HidcziSrHGmCX8NdbNq7w3bDHbeZ82ekAfxxlQqxY/KDYOBt6l 4wKToRt/IZFspQ==; In-Reply-To: (message from Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B6llmann?= on Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:33:18 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326367 Archived-At: > From: Gerd Möllmann > Cc: "Pip Cet via \"Emacs development discussions.\"" , > Óscar Fuentes > Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:33:18 +0100 > > Pip Cet writes: > > > This may be a very stupid idea, but why not use a separate process? > > Not stupid at all. I thought about something similar in a different > context, namely if one could decouple the GUI part of Emacs from the > rest. If it can be done by two processes, it can also be done by two threads in the same process. Right?