From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jules Tamagnan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23609: 25.0.92; Python eldoc freeze Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 13:13:27 -0400 Message-ID: <86mvncpwso.fsf@gmail.com> References: <867fejo4g2.fsf@gmail.com> <57454201.10607@easy-emacs.de> <86bn3umahs.fsf@gmail.com> <5745C5D9.50701@easy-emacs.de> <861t4orf3h.fsf@gmail.com> <834m9k3hmz.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpmg229w.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464282867 1405 80.91.229.3 (26 May 2016 17:14:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Gutov , 23609@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 26 19:14:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yrN-0006lG-QD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 19:14:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39672 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yrM-0005A3-7b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:14:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yrG-000595-Ol for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yrC-0006Fw-G2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yrC-0006Fq-CD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yrC-0007ye-2z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jules Tamagnan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23609 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23609-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23609.146428281630620 (code B ref 23609); Thu, 26 May 2016 17:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23609) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2016 17:13:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40792 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yqm-0007xo-67 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:13:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com ([209.85.192.46]:34397) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b5yqk-0007xb-65 for 23609@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:13:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 90so40012132qgz.1 for <23609@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:13:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=yfVfrw9TU19BoyJyrNExasNQDeCAmvxqp8qqN1brG1k=; b=WzEsDAS6InFCyMl3TDYffE/HEnmEu3t6MWH8Sq6zer90ems8DmU93jckpZcxCphJMX PKNvE7Zr0B8XYYHrWNHjQq4bFUIu3hh4l1gZMvpIlY90dccWWLSRHdzIpTVa4MAm3w+I rF6pLqRW94kRoGR6BeXI+KypxZo6H/MU5lc+aniAozTdL+IBcg+LN2a960tDQXvKlG/S NeS46j5QTz0IfHmn6/vl6eDvZYiPjgKcX+tYs0yHZaegmgT63cvOYCekR3FeZfITZynf ufcN6AXo6OycDjlFzGTlPzRpv94yKfeINJSJD6iZOd+vLzyKkwHlc4RSMeogwEIjDavx miZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=yfVfrw9TU19BoyJyrNExasNQDeCAmvxqp8qqN1brG1k=; b=Nr8PHrzsnefE9sxNwuNG8LxU2MJUWcRb98BTeAwHiTzNNIf0+9FJYJdzKN6vAgrCTt 4sYjdkLhwEA4L68dTJbQ83+l8fJy7MRI/DsvLjd3J0MyzDb88gat5kGBJNGA3Bxk85CG 3QaRHdupspC3hGJ8b7oPSbEIl2n9lqqRy7SJA3mwwzDoJ2cszqpggotsWNK6tV75k8QJ 4rzQ6anK807UG6qAlq5d+Uf1ya7J21s5Y/hbsxTk1z5YwLr0QWx1qeJxquMDCn0gtc+0 jktLDRT/dsahdLMY/zTtfxTz2RlCCJs6u1l5wcNLG1KB/52DwU0zhCx5cSccPvcJ5LHS BE7w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIUOxZfK4d4T6k1xZCA3mSiOaH4CMuzwHGFSFQXg/6hJ+pkkDarcfU3YVfNl3oc7A== X-Received: by 10.140.152.16 with SMTP id 16mr9948849qhy.77.1464282808670; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:13:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bandersnatch ([130.132.236.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k61sm4093527qtd.5.2016.05.26.10.13.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 May 2016 10:13:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83wpmg229w.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 26 May 2016 19:48:59 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118714 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Cc: 23609@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 19:37:57 +0300 >> >> On 05/26/2016 07:31 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > Not IMO, since an easy workaround is available. >> >> Disabling eldoc-mode? It's cutting off a very handy feature. > > A feature that wasn't turned on in 24.5, and whose turning on exposed > this bug. At least that's my understanding. > > If I'm right, then either this isn't a regression, or a regression > with an easy workaround. > > Which doesn't mean we shouldn't try fixing this bug, just that it is > not critical enough to delay the release if not fixed. Motivated > volunteers are very much encouraged to work on a fix; if that fix is > safe, I see no reason not to accept it on the release branch. > > Thanks. I've already filled out the proper paperwork and wouldn't mind doing it. Would a timeout, of one second seem acceptable? If getting the documentation takes longer than 1 second then it should timeout and we should then locally set global-eldoc and eldoc mode to -1. Thanks