From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via help-gnu-emacs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 03:20:22 +0200 Message-ID: <86muiyxi21.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <878sv7sp3r.fsf@telefonica.net>> <83r28z8zl9.fsf@gnu.org> <20190515210924.sijzy6mnpgzkt4gm@Ergus>> <83ftpecwu1.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516161408.4dov3dwk5h4yoizn@Ergus>> <838sv6cmwt.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516202327.5cgy2s4kppy3ahxa@Ergus> <871s0yqg2i.fsf@telefonica.net> <3210C8E9-7A74-47D6-81A0-470948E6D09C@gmail.com> <87r28xq0j1.fsf@telefonica.net>> <20190517055202.ted62gt6hqcip7xt@Ergus>> <83mujlbgjh.fsf@gnu.org>> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="238713"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 04 03:26:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyDK-000zow-1Q for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 03:26:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43371 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyDJ-0007Hm-3A for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 21:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48540) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyD5-0007HU-6t for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 21:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyCr-0000g7-Kv for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 21:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=36048 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyCf-00009q-3f for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 21:25:29 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyCE-000yTx-J4 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 03:25:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:m01I2EmQSrqmCz/JWEf5TnB79yc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120729 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: >> Not much we can do about that. Feel free to >> lobby distros to include Emacs. IMO, if >> something is related to 40-year old >> decision, it is this one. > > Yes. Unix distributions did usually include > both vi and Emacs. Why wouldn't GNU/Linux > distributions include both? What's the "40-year old decision"? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal