From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via help-gnu-emacs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 04:29:17 +0200 Message-ID: <86muiwvk76.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <83ftpecwu1.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516161408.4dov3dwk5h4yoizn@Ergus> <838sv6cmwt.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516202327.5cgy2s4kppy3ahxa@Ergus> <871s0yqg2i.fsf@telefonica.net> <3210C8E9-7A74-47D6-81A0-470948E6D09C@gmail.com> <87r28xq0j1.fsf@telefonica.net> <20190517055202.ted62gt6hqcip7xt@Ergus> <83mujlbgjh.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnoht56v.fsf@mail.de> <20190517171917.37qbj5bbl5wtnjd2@Ergus> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="41892"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 05 04:29:52 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hYLgV-000Akj-Sz for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 04:29:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34297 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYLgU-0007El-Oj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 22:29:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYLgJ-0007ET-Go for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 22:29:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYLgD-0005Op-Q3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 22:29:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=42420 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYLgB-0005GM-Sc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 22:29:33 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hYLg5-000ALo-Ih for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 04:29:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:4Sdh4XoWUKmIfLBZrrqOUVUnKW8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120745 Archived-At: Ergus wrote: > I have experienced the issue that when adding > a new functionality (to isearch) there is not > an available/standard method to assign > a binding for it. But also I ended > discovering a new set of shortcuts > I didn't know. If you feel like you run out of shortcuts, you can define a new prefix key, e.g.: (define-prefix-command 'C-o-prefix) (global-set-key "\C-o" 'C-o-prefix) > But ergoemacs actually failed because all the > modules and packages bind the default keys to > the "expected" action. So for example > next-line is hardcoded to anything that moves > one line down in helm, counsel, emms, and so > on. So at the end the user never gets a real > 100% ergoemacs experience. Similar happens in > evil mode or even in cua-mode that is > integrated inside emacs. One never gets the > 100% of the experience. If you set it up 100% as you'd like it, mode for mode, you'll get it. > Please, don't tell me that this won't fly; > I already know. It will fly if you do it. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal