From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55743: 28.1.50; No directory error in comp-run-async-workers Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 10:49:13 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86mteunq4m.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <86y1yhsxin.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83wne1h66x.fsf@gnu.org> <86wne1trce.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83leuhgljn.fsf@gnu.org> <861qw97x41.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83h754hbwf.fsf@gnu.org> <86a6aw2o4e.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83o7zcf9kw.fsf@gnu.org> <861qw7zf6r.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ee07fq6y.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6avfo7j.fsf@gnu.org> <86k09zxeiu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83h752evn6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39782"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: schwab@suse.de, 55743@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 03 09:58:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nx2CD-000ACi-Pt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 09:58:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54954 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nx2CC-0008K9-Ga for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 03:58:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nx2C2-0008Hy-MW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 03:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nx2C2-0002QH-E1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 03:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nx2C2-0006xI-Da for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 03:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 07:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55743 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 55743-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55743.165424304526667 (code B ref 55743); Fri, 03 Jun 2022 07:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55743) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2022 07:57:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55179 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nx2BQ-0006w3-Pf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 03:57:24 -0400 Original-Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:40349) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nx2BP-0006vd-1o for 55743@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 03:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACEE420000E; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 07:57:15 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83h752evn6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 02 Jun 2022 22:02:37 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:233589 Archived-At: >> >> But native compilation is more like infrastructure, and not a Lisp >> >> program. >> > >> > Yes. But that is not relevant for the issue at hand. >> >> So you think that native compilation failure is a user error? > > No, I think it's an error in the command that caused default-directory > be set to a non-existent directory -- the error which you already > fixed. I meant other cases such as M-: (setq default-directory "/non-existent/foo/bar") RET