From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59486: completion-auto-wrap disobeyed by vertical navigation Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:56:07 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86mt8blaoo.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <8635aayjm6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86zgchbj61.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86h6yoye87.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <834juoydlv.fsf@gnu.org> <86pmdcw6hj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83zgcgur9t.fsf@gnu.org> <86a64f327i.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83lenzv37h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36771"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 59486@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 28 09:59:51 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ozZzT-0009Sy-Qq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:59:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozZym-0005JO-OF; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 03:59:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozZyg-0005Iu-Nk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 03:59:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ozZyg-0000IE-E8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 03:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ozZyg-0003Ox-A1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 03:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59486 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59486-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59486.166962593213054 (code B ref 59486); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59486) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2022 08:58:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47330 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ozZyV-0003OU-RS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 03:58:52 -0500 Original-Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:38783) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ozZyT-0003OC-D6 for 59486@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 03:58:49 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 971EA1BF20D; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 08:58:41 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83lenzv37h.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:38:26 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:249272 Archived-At: >> >> minibuffer-previous-* are intended to navigate the completion list >> >> horizontally while the minibuffer is active, and minibuffer-previous-line-* >> >> vertically. >> > >> > Then the names could be simplified as minibuffer-up-line and >> > minibuffer-down-line. It will also make the names less confusing, IMO. >> >> It's not only about the minibuffer, but also about completions, >> so the commands names should also include the word "completion". > > minibuffer-up-completions-line is still shorter and less confusing. 'minibuffer-previous-line-completion' is named after 'previous-line' that is not named 'up-line'. There are 'left-char', 'left-word', etc. only in horizontal direction, but no 'up-line' in vertical direction. So it makes no sense to propagate this inconsistency to completion command names where there are only 'previous-completion', but no 'left-completion'. >> It does the same as icomplete-vertical-mode where the arrow keys >> are not confusing. > > icomplete-vertical-mode is a an opt-in feature, so what it does is less > relevant to the issue at point, IMO. The proposed feature is also opt-in.