From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#71224: 30.0.50; SIGSEGV in start_display Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 18:55:40 +0300 Message-ID: <86msoaszgj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86o78rv499.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37064"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 71224@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Clemente Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 28 17:57:25 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sBzCW-0009Lx-Qt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 May 2024 17:57:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sBzC3-0007a5-Je; Tue, 28 May 2024 11:56:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sBzC1-0007ZQ-DG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2024 11:56:53 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sBzC1-000749-5D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2024 11:56:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sBzC9-0005QW-US for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2024 11:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 15:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71224 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 71224-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71224.171691176220787 (code B ref 71224); Tue, 28 May 2024 15:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 71224) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2024 15:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46831 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sBzBB-0005PD-T4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2024 11:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sBzBA-0005Oh-3S for 71224@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2024 11:56:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sBzAv-0006yr-A0; Tue, 28 May 2024 11:55:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=dJJStJlECs0+6C19eJmMPYbaecd68mFrEgdRrVo2rZ4=; b=V7X0MKGyNzcL NM2X1y8O9MxXDX27JH7T0Z54Cp4pZKnhiTt0n0ptmgJKBP/hXiR+FIEhogk8ZCQ6solnT6OKI6BCg KaEVUSSw4k+/n+80FF5rc85mhq3+2hewsKqGFicv8cwDSTtAIkOtLEy4EdUVHimxI5GU/2NOvc6gG hRfJUvx0j6lzMKcGtCxbld3D5qG1odtHQBGu/kLgwhY93iV21oYi8NxlvmjHYwkhnY1111TztaTTW wl25kJOWxS5+L5A0NsplL5ui3YBnExYA3oyU73egE9ATOVi90ESoxm7hUdkBIs2rRmYjIAqvbdA2l qj4kRoN1NcLFV/8arMajQg==; In-Reply-To: (message from Daniel Clemente on Tue, 28 May 2024 15:36:05 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:286094 Archived-At: > From: Daniel Clemente > Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 15:36:05 +0000 > Cc: 71224@debbugs.gnu.org > > I forgot whether in this case (#71224) the stack was also near the stack limit. Maybe when it's so close to a > stack overflow, these SIGSEGV can happen first. AFAIU, this is nowhere near the C stack limit. The Lisp nesting is near its limit, but that's a far cry from exhausting the C stack, AFAICT.