From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f3891da4972 1/2: ; * src/w32image.c (thumb_type_data): Revert parts of recent change. Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 16:12:43 +0300 Message-ID: <86mso6p1kk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <171713741024.17516.6154639966246811985@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240531063650.CB52AC5400C@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <875xuu9zzu.fsf@yahoo.com> <86ttiep8tq.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmna8bw1.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40459"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 31 15:13:38 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sD24g-000AKR-6n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 31 May 2024 15:13:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sD23t-0002x2-TQ; Fri, 31 May 2024 09:12:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sD23s-0002wc-7m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2024 09:12:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sD23r-0007mK-MH; Fri, 31 May 2024 09:12:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=OW3Pr7kM0DuB4Qq01dZdVfqLYkvC0E3Sp2HRdPlrjaQ=; b=S3oL2ZeTtryh +6Euf0EgkRxNH9whM0k6DPJHecSrPQ1q6doPNkYWzIzg5dNb88dMRoDJ/t9jjYRwE7WcECSWld6TM +s2Q1SmsEpO1qbx4j02rHei+90OnsXSCUpkkwZzhmO9LVH6AxzVmelDEHQbt8aCrtq69tst0F9Hmt 7hn3/kC6QY8SoRlVndD6Asy482a2ukRCTf5gb+nV8neDYxCx61wwKRGlnerQTwCI28FaWrKqvK/QG wHAYTS+kRZb/fuWbjHHHtflJO1s7QrPi5ETg+HbZDe0/xan0hsNjJpEH9nSOZHUD+Y8gHT4UDuS4o 6iMYeA/uyXt18aD4BdNiWg==; In-Reply-To: <87wmna8bw1.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Fri, 31 May 2024 19:21:50 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319776 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 19:21:50 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > We don't adhere to that part of the coding standards, and I see no > > reason why we should start now. > > When was this decision made? Long ago. Just look at the sources. > > (The original reason, now lost to history, was that CC Mode produced > > better indentation that way.) > > Wasn't that the indentation that is nowadays only applied to `enum's, > i.e., > > struct foo > { > int x, y; > }; I'm not sure I understand what you are saying, but standards.texi says to use the same format for struct's and enum's. Also, neither CC Mode nor c-ts-mode produce a 2-space offset before braces in a struct that is declared at top level.