From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pure space Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 17:29:43 +0300 Message-ID: <86mslb1aug.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87cym8jngk.fsf@protonmail.com> <864j7j65b1.fsf@gnu.org> <874j7jk06d.fsf@protonmail.com> <86bk1r2zj7.fsf@gnu.org> <87sev3idl0.fsf@protonmail.com> <86zfpb1edk.fsf@gnu.org> <87o75ri8lu.fsf@protonmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34353"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 17 16:30:38 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sfKRx-0008jL-G8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:30:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sfKRH-0001Rh-QN; Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:29:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sfKRG-0001RW-K2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:29:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sfKRG-00048g-Bp; Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:29:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=KMyK4B2AWxImCrSyxR8e2wwkaaOVf8mdLDO/WUaAG0s=; b=GohhafVYNlE3 WY4CYzfStAQUioaToMBYM/HR6snHRaVgyKfI9VBU65AW/Q4jXDvAsMtPE3QlexxCqmSDQLBHZH7aC KF58UzXEFqHNp3yhXPuoYKvdW7BQ1oLX4NBymvy5Vs8dbSQTVoWGqgQLt2xqqQRfgn657L+8sVUP0 TDwvPf2aTaxdN/4/R+/opvF0iixuYivj/pnN9BVf2qA87mpD1tVgA906J8ATSYh0Uyg41e5nVljDi QZkIhoqHqAKBmljjAQyOpncSWLiOnDUURN1+kwHknFbD2XwOeCHKnpwOlDYwfGP17hItS8ULnzVhb InoemOKA+IWYYGjnzy9H7Q==; In-Reply-To: <87o75ri8lu.fsf@protonmail.com> (message from Pip Cet on Sat, 17 Aug 2024 13:26:08 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:322857 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 13:26:08 +0000 > From: Pip Cet > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > > And I don't think I care for your hints about my alleged lies. The > > fact that we disagree doesn't mean that I intentionally tell lies, it > > just means we have different perspectives, different experiences, and > > different responsibilities here. > > I think that warrants a separate response: I'm sorry I caused offense > there. I think you're often inconsistent, but I don't believe that means > you're ever lying. I'm not "often inconsistent". You often disagree with my reasoning and the relative weights I assign to some considerations, but that's not "inconsistency". > > I saw no patch attached to the original message (nor any other message > > in this thread). Am I lying again? > > No, this time it's me being inconsistent. Patch attached (this time, > hopefully). Ahm... ENPATCH