From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#73730: 31.0.50; Support for color fonts on MS-Windows Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:00:28 +0300 Message-ID: <86msisbder.fsf@gnu.org> References: <36a6b4d5-c719-44d6-957d-bcd7db5a854b@imayhem.com> <86o73s14x5.fsf@gnu.org> <0a0c622c-5b69-4f30-94b1-67a238e124b4@imayhem.com> <861q0gqpkf.fsf@gnu.org> <0d2238ff-5cf9-4ba7-97ab-11b76892198d@imayhem.com> <86bjzjp7vv.fsf@gnu.org> <80dc50bd-b2d4-4d21-ad38-322412588b3b@imayhem.com> <86o73ej2u7.fsf@gnu.org> <8e5ffc88-dda8-4b4d-a133-f80029825347@imayhem.com> <86plnrdtm1.fsf@gnu.org> <86bjzaemev.fsf@gnu.org> <68b9d35b-b8e1-4830-8ad9-8c33258e0980@imayhem.com> <864j50d4od.fsf@gnu.org> <78477402-2af1-4da1-bf02-11d1b0e4b4a0@imayhem.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20433"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 73730@debbugs.gnu.org To: Cecilio Pardo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 25 14:02:55 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1t4J1q-00055y-Vw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:02:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t4J0l-0002Ne-0L; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:01:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t4J0V-0002DQ-5X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:01:37 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t4J0U-0004nT-TA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:01:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=imum+W4YYzoGBajy4jjLd2H9kW5bJRBW3qG4lJEUmVw=; b=hUShlkb6eKBMRpWrcrgw1JQ0HwuwkAacVHALoV3gfIKmhmtwxoQdM+RkwqRSnzcBqeaEqCPfnwXI6wM1C66z5CSydkPrW/P1JolTBbdy0j7jHu1rTNjKEz3O7OAZCgxJ8F3wafei0oFUJlgemtmIS6mT8qCp8+OrHjoj3HQoKHQsQnD22nheNIs7cM17pmuQBplPRjLyBVk9DAtLlo5mXsrXR73q8Bnb6P2IFEDNjTWSbU+RvDbI3F9jkn60BB6KLkyZBFHD/ctWsA/JKRgmTMtTktw4i7G4FwvueDDnuHoKy49cw+owM7G8x822PmXotO1o//Hgag2HkEAyPknYQg==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t4J10-0000Dk-PF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 12:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73730 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 73730-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73730.1729857704786 (code B ref 73730); Fri, 25 Oct 2024 12:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 73730) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2024 12:01:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37599 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t4J0h-0000Cc-Np for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:01:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40510) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t4J0f-0000CN-Ld for 73730@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:01:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t4J02-0004iA-2h; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:01:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=imum+W4YYzoGBajy4jjLd2H9kW5bJRBW3qG4lJEUmVw=; b=G2eCxdBSx9pAXqNOptRa Cl7oX0lArwiR+HxQBAbWSM7uFU3qsHrsy6MnUnAleWoY7vPjmXEpKeTv+WX6B4VVM+QyC3toP86gg 3RZpZYoO8M0SnFKm0s31ec6eL0RFTlQa3cuMoJzvbWLoZ/zv3p/CIEK/VYecBOFbarbN+Vn8dgUAb YgZbdbknTMOBPkukCeVlGfRGJsSFTsiOexbLf1XzboCcei8Os/HQ8ApKgICBAFAGl2nQAfpLthTby t4vAUT7IeGUEAp7umPSCFRVP8HnW4MoKpVNByogtPIwzESfdSMTqHkMVSQTR1iQ0hMmTGLMlg2Usk yTJmlkOkHw/jDw==; In-Reply-To: <78477402-2af1-4da1-bf02-11d1b0e4b4a0@imayhem.com> (message from Cecilio Pardo on Fri, 25 Oct 2024 12:17:37 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:294226 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 12:17:37 +0200 > Cc: 73730@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Cecilio Pardo > > On 25/10/2024 9:26, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Thanks, I will review this shortly. Meanwhile, could you please look > > at how Emacs with this patch displays some complex Emoji sequences? > > Some of them look incorrect to me. For example, this sequence from > > admin/unidata/emoji-zwj-sequences.txt: > > > > 1F469 200D 1F469 200D 1F467 200D 1F466 ; RGI_Emoji_ZWJ_Sequence ; family: woman, woman, girl, boy # E2.0 [1] (๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ) > > > > when displayed using Segoe UI Emoji, is shown with the "boy" part > > overlapping the closing parenthesis, which looks incorrect to me. > > "C-u C-x =" claims all of the codepoints of the sequence were composed > > into a single grapheme cluster, but it doesn't look like that on > > display, and the cursor doesn't include the "boy" part. > > I dont's see that, but I do see that the individual glyphs are truncated > on the left side, even when removing color rendering. Do you see > it? Yes. > I will investigate this first, in case the defects are related. Thanks.