From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.50; Can't switch to a buffer Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:00:31 +0200 Message-ID: <86lkbd1sr4.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <87hcm2nxu6.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <87zlzus0z2.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <87fy1lsiio.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189501252 977 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2007 09:00:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:00:52 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 11 19:00:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IV96C-0002LZ-OZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:00:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IV1bu-0003XV-C8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:00:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IV1bp-0003U3-2X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:00:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IV1bm-0003QM-Fx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:00:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IV1bm-0003QC-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:00:34 -0400 Original-Received: from pc3.berlin.powerweb.de ([62.67.228.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IV1bl-0006MF-Nk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:00:34 -0400 Original-Received: from quinscape.de (dslnet.212-29-44.ip210.dokom.de [212.29.44.210] (may be forged)) by pc3.berlin.powerweb.de (8.9.3p3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03147 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:00:30 +0200 X-Delivered-To: Original-Received: (qmail 2186 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2007 09:00:31 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by ns.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Sep 2007 09:00:31 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9FBC68F8ED; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:00:31 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87fy1lsiio.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Tue\, 11 Sep 2007 10\:39\:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78574 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: > Leo writes: > > Hi Leo, > >> But if I use `emacsclient -t' to start another tty frame, there is no >> problem switching to any buffer. why should we make it different for X >> frames? > > There are users that use things like "one X frame per buffer" and > pop-up-windows. For them raising the frame which shows the buffer is > the right thing to do. > > But maybe it would be good if emacs ignored tty frames when looking for > frames that display a given buffer. Emacs should most certainly ignore any frames not on the present terminal when looking to display a given buffer. -- David Kastrup