From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Sebastien Vauban" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How to know is a buffer is a temporary one? Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:58:48 +0200 Organization: Sebastien Vauban Message-ID: <86li4orvxj.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <86k3k975fj.fsf@somewhere.org> <861u6h42el.fsf@somewhere.org> <86fvuxf7vh.fsf@somewhere.org> <8661vszelh.fsf@somewhere.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375192807 15538 80.91.229.3 (30 Jul 2013 14:00:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Tue Jul 30 16:00:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4ATA-0004NS-WD for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:00:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57672 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4ATA-0007Zb-L9 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39293) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4ASl-0007Qi-DC for help-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:59:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4ASf-0006cS-DC for help-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:59:43 -0400 Original-Received: from dd5e0353a.access.telenet.be ([213.224.53.58]:53210 helo=mail.missioncriticalit.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4ASf-0006FW-5H for help-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from MUNDANEUM. (unknown [10.10.10.51]) by mail.missioncriticalit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99010501091; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:59:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Url: Under construction... X-Archive: encrypt In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:26:17 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 213.224.53.58 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:92551 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Why are you saying that that version somehow better is? > > It eliminates a redundancy (the two calls to `message' are reduced to one), I did not catch that! > and it uses the same test as is used elsewhere in Emacs ("buffer name starts > with a space" is used for example to hide buffers in completion or to decide > whether buffer-undo-list should be initially set to nil or the t). OK, good reasons... Thanks for explaining! Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban