From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52286: 28.0.90; [PATCH] Be consistent in naming of separators in context menu Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 21:25:49 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86lezgztqa.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <7a7d6b5c-ff5e-3d55-bef4-8ce8e163abdb@gmail.com> <8335n75z4a.fsf@gnu.org> <3788dcca-c2bd-99b2-b54d-463e12cd52c0@gmail.com> <835ys349p2.fsf@gnu.org> <8335n53nai.fsf@gnu.org> <6faca77f-d732-d13e-2689-76e1e0943368@gmail.com> <86sfto25ek.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ilukzub8.fsf@gnu.org> <86tue4zu1j.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ee58ztus.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19586"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, 52286@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 15 20:28:18 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n8oio-0004za-DI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 20:28:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n8oin-0003jf-9E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:28:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n8oiY-0003h3-VU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:28:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n8oiX-0003NM-QS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n8oiX-0005T5-Jz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 19:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52286 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 52286-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52286.164227486820989 (code B ref 52286); Sat, 15 Jan 2022 19:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52286) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2022 19:27:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41838 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n8oiJ-0005SS-Tx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:27:48 -0500 Original-Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:38999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n8oiI-0005SB-7s; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:27:46 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21EB320005; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 19:27:38 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83ee58ztus.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 15 Jan 2022 21:23:07 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224336 Archived-At: tags 52286 wontfix close 52286 29.0.50 quit >> >> Maybe it's too late to fix this inconsistency too? >> > >> > I don't even understand why we should care about this nit. >> >> For purely aesthetic purposes :-) > > I suggest to forget about this. We have enough real problems on our > hands. Ok, so closing.