From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Installing cond* in core Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 09:32:07 +0200 Message-ID: <86le896hhk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wmrui3dc.fsf@yahoo.com> <86ttmy551l.fsf@gnu.org> <87bk95j53j.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16639"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 28 08:33:01 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rTzf3-00043l-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 08:33:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTzeG-0000Iq-R1; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 02:32:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTzeF-0000IS-Dg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 02:32:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTzeD-0006YV-Im; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 02:32:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=7+pZXpTUu5D2bSFVG+S6sX5+7o6v5BYRNm20CivV1EY=; b=Z0cIjocHQ+j3 X/3dhaJKBzLjyURp2M30wZ0QOER3h4Zqa+BcntK31+grenWRvIztBzHl+wucFkLjxk5PrNyuBrgYc e7yaPARCxyGzajXVzpCIxblZ5Tv3Em2+HvTM0ii097JLbDclS4tpMogKABXgWPBxdceKgXQSqxWZf W4AHT/Z9tgB5/6Tdm65YAXovR8JLQo0nzgU5cqXC8/zu7tgBP7Smn+yTPiQ4QUFAFVPtwaDGNyQee TVuPCnLumLTefKOYO7A+XrPZO/SNdo7hsDfnYMwOSO3+GHAOz/pJsifbVlnUJUnsGodbpYQ0cAXtY +h+vCKB4/dR2B0Tzp72UWw==; In-Reply-To: <87bk95j53j.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:21:20 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315535 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:21:20 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > This is not a "fair competition" kind of issue. Whether cond* will > > fly on the same flight level as pcase, or higher or lower, will be > > decided based on actual experience and other relevant technical > > aspects, and nothing else. > > Fair enough, but please don't object to: > > (eval-when-compile > (require 'condstar)) > > in x-dnd.el and the like. Why should I object to that, assuming that the use of cond* in whatever file does this is justified?