From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: MPS: Loaded pdump
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 20:49:59 +0300
Message-ID: <86le4cuvug.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m2pltvb6lo.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <87bk5fp0km.fsf@gmail.com>
 <m25xvnax13.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <87seyrni6f.fsf@gmail.com>
 <m2wmo39g6y.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <m2cypunll0.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <87msoygkb5.fsf@gmail.com> <86seyq3qvr.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m2plttnbsm.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <m2bk5dn80x.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <m2h6f213gk.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <m2cypo2451.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <87v83g79rw.fsf@gmail.com> <m2v83gxuom.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="7620"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Gerd =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 14 19:51:12 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1s6wIy-0001jL-FD
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 May 2024 19:51:12 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1s6wIK-0004lK-Dg; Tue, 14 May 2024 13:50:32 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1s6wHu-0003wX-6T
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2024 13:50:09 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1s6wHq-0006gQ-5x; Tue, 14 May 2024 13:50:03 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=fTUH9CdzXBE5Sk71w1n+mTFT9A93nyqBo8mJNDOES9Q=; b=Ywhq5rfmS5TG3e+UeFjI
 KDXFT1ES9yXQe5WB5grXH68a7bDSwiHj/hhUov6FaBdnscpS1ox+6rllonc7OAYA2dzck60rQP85T
 gw86p3cpEb7POp8u6boPAxrP9NG4C/Yrwx5dnlWZvr6S27askbCLU0544UZF5D4lKnisnQ0ZzUUiW
 85IAENsl0PoIcALJG9leUVbBkCRhOd3U9CysLenMNZVMiM6s7n3vPF/KjpLAWPppMbhOD6NPDf81l
 WWEtkdWsVRZViLYBcLDdNigMf3ofuqsVGyTV225SPD3MVvUilZCoCGkwA+n3rjEx5lYttUBqrhKnw
 RRW9x3SwgIKXDQ==;
In-Reply-To: <m2v83gxuom.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> (message from Gerd
 =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= on Tue, 14 May 2024 17:46:49 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319230
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/319230>

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 17:46:49 +0200
> 
> It's more that nothing in pdumper enforces objects to be contiguous. If
> O1 and O2 are pointers to adjacent objects in the dump, then nothing
> enforces that O1 + O1.size == O2. I didn't want to assume that is the
> case if nothing makes it sure.

Isn't that how pdumper.c works?  After dumping an object, it moves
pointer to immediately after it.  No?