From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Subversion of user chosen major mode by Emacs. Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 19:38:35 +0300 Message-ID: <86le3sshdg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86r0dmtbk2.fsf@gnu.org> <63afa31a-7874-4d1f-a17a-14a64ba516cb@gutov.dev> <4197c4a8-ee12-4fa7-9201-4d26f3be59c6@gutov.dev> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3860"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 29 18:39:33 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sCMKr-0000lB-Dr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 May 2024 18:39:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCMK3-0005Vg-7b; Wed, 29 May 2024 12:38:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCMK0-0005VT-QG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2024 12:38:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCMJy-0000Zh-H6; Wed, 29 May 2024 12:38:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=tgRePT2x1UaGUAQGBmRNfs83hUEzF331NIGFwhHunPQ=; b=iiYaVgBoiwBn xpa0YWr+wy6pkHpU7habfpsKisx5cHtFp3KqGtGF9dHWd+vGfQOeiSt3P+Pt44Ar5KcmfIANWcuVK ZkLm5Gn9eA1gA+pPlCXeDszMiV9VQtOWDRqee9fmLAlyR8mo9hJD2NBHyYnHXgS+lEKtQ6JpQ+xFm RdykTnd02HZVgoyATyST2SHFEIH3pfbU3Rinlp2Ok+FRAMlH3hmK7C1pRWf2FQMrB39bXRZZBV4bg MbVulmk0T0VECnCgDxuJWaaCz28nl8GaU4KAefILNjzLm2IVIIUboXRivq5oMyWUhZ4933W/l4rS6 3PBDF1NdcixjpQwm1LAY4g==; In-Reply-To: <4197c4a8-ee12-4fa7-9201-4d26f3be59c6@gutov.dev> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Wed, 29 May 2024 19:08:46 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319700 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 19:08:46 +0300 > Cc: Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > > The latest symptom of this misunderstanding, which I bumped into > > yesterday, is that Emacs changes the major mode of a C buffer with M-x > > revert-buffer. This is clearly unacceptable. > > And that started happening since commit 6b2f85caa6 No, it didn't. That commit changed nothing about how revert-buffer behaves. Please stop these insinuations. I said I don't want to go into that argument again, so you want to force me?? Just let it be.