From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noboru Ota Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] Submitting new package Org-remark Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 10:37:52 +0100 Message-ID: <86k0eh8sy7.fsf@nobiot.com> References: <865yq3el1f.fsf@nobiot.com> <8635l6ga7v.fsf@nobiot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16123"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 30 10:39:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nE6g5-00040K-Mu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 10:39:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51490 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nE6g4-0005cF-4G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 04:39:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nE6eu-0004vi-1i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 04:38:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a01:4f8:fff0:2d:8::215] (port=50269 helo=outbound.soverin.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nE6es-0005Zo-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 04:38:07 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ACB0602CC; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 09:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.142]) by soverin.net In-Reply-To: X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a01:4f8:fff0:2d:8::215 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f8:fff0:2d:8::215; envelope-from=me@nobiot.com; helo=outbound.soverin.net X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285594 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > [ BTW, your package didn't build yet because of: > ======== Building tarball > archive-devel/org-remark-0.2.0.0.20220129.95541.tar... Problem > with copyright notices: Missing copyright notice in > org-remark/demo/custom-pens.el Build error for Thank you, Stefan. I see. I assumed `.elpaignore` would also get applied to copyright check function, but I just learned that it is not the case. I have a feeling that `elpa-admin.el' could have a patch so that it would also use `.elpaignore' to filter out `.el' files to check copyright assignment? Function `elpaa--copyright-files' looks at `:ignored-files' spec but not `.elpaignore' like function `elpaa--make-one-tarball-1' does. > Any chance you'd be interested in improving `describe-package`? Interested, yes. I will need some time to get round to it (I have another request from you regarding `text-clone'; I have not forgotten about it). If the time is not an issue, I will see what I can do. I have a big life event coming in October this year and my mind is already being consumed by it (Org-remark is last project hanging off from the last year). Of course, others can jump in and do what is suggested. Thanks again. Noboru