From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f6967d2 1/3: Allow for the completion buffer to be automatically selected Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 20:56:56 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86k0a1vb4n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <875yrga0oi.fsf@thornhill.no> <87sfukb5s8.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29786"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 20:03:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nw6D6-0007c2-Ov for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 20:03:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nw6D5-0001yu-Ju for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 14:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nw68Y-00089g-FA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 13:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:49377) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nw68V-0002h2-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 13:58:33 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD346240002; Tue, 31 May 2022 17:58:28 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87sfukb5s8.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Wed, 22 Dec 2021 23:04:23 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.193; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay1-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290433 Archived-At: > The idea is that completion-auto-select and completion-wrap-movement > provide is a method to reduce all completion operations to a single > key (tab), without having to change modifiers. Every time I customize completion options, first I change completion-auto-help and completion-auto-select, then spend time trying to find the third related variable under the same prefix. Does this suggest it would be better to share the same prefix, i.e. to name the third variable completion-auto-wrap?