From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59935: 29.0.60; project-list-buffers is slow Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 19:51:48 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86k02wpl1n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <86a63vi2lu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4a78ffcc-15fb-27ac-48b9-82fe84c596aa@yandex.ru> <86bko9na29.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83bko9u8yy.fsf@gnu.org> <0c3df029-1e0b-7965-59c2-062018a0af7a@yandex.ru> <838rjdu7np.fsf@gnu.org> <3eb92bd5-7552-0529-19a7-b9db315b382a@yandex.ru> <83359lu5o6.fsf@gnu.org> <70602760-546c-0c7c-b4a9-fdfe8d2c4e5e@yandex.ru> <83wn6xsme7.fsf@gnu.org> <86359ksj29.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83mt7sr0pu.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33751"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 59935@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 12 18:53:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p4mzH-0008cj-37 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:53:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4mz9-00014s-BU; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4mz8-00014k-20 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4mz7-0004Sk-Pa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:53:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4mz7-0001hO-LS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:53:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59935 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59935-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59935.16708675696515 (code B ref 59935); Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59935) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2022 17:52:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54390 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4myv-0001h1-8B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:52:49 -0500 Original-Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:56415) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4myt-0001gt-BM for 59935@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:52:47 -0500 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78067100021; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:52:18 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83mt7sr0pu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 12 Dec 2022 19:27:57 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250734 Archived-At: >> +** The argument FILTER-PREDICATE of 'list-buffers-noselect' is obsolete now. >> +It will be removed in next versions. > > I thought we wanted to make the command faster in Emacs 29. I very > much doubt that deprecation of an argument will have that effect. > > I'm also not sure I agree with obsoleting and removing that argument. > We don't have enough justification for that, not yet. That it was > introduced for a particular use case, and that use case no longer uses > it, doesn't mean there won't be others. After all, we don't introduce > additional arguments unless we think it will be useful in more than > one case. Having both FILTER-PREDICATE and BUFFER-LIST-FUNCTION is too problematic. Which one should take priority over another when both specified?