From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Easy Customization for Directory Local Variables Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 09:43:54 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86jzs5r0b9.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <1199c8c5-b564-7af1-165f-3f7b19f5bda5@gmail.com> <26c0a93a-c8d5-422f-7e9b-892029478fd4@alphapapa.net> <8fd3190a-c401-e650-b851-063d430673d3@gmail.com> <86a5ta193q.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <23124c8c-b68b-5c19-382d-4055f28e35e5@gmail.com> <86bkdi6udv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838r8l8tt1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8140"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: maurooaranda@gmail.com, adam@alphapapa.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 02 09:00:11 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qnCuZ-0001s7-49 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 09:00:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qnCtq-000319-L5; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 02:59:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qnCtp-00030x-5C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 02:59:25 -0400 Original-Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::223]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qnCtn-0004wK-AE; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 02:59:24 -0400 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A37A960004; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 06:59:16 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <838r8l8tt1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2023 08:41:46 +0300") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::223; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay3-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:311232 Archived-At: >> There is no single prefix in files-x.el, but still names are quite >> consistent. So you could choose any prefix you think would be >> internally consistent between all your new functions and variables. > > Why should this be in files-x.el? why not in custom.el, for example? If these functions implement a new customization type then a good place would be in custom.el indeed. Only functions that write the dir-locals file could remain in files-x.el.