From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving packages out of core to ELPA Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 17:51:24 +0200 Message-ID: <86jzn3t7gj.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25162"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: JD Smith Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 17 16:52:18 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rbMzB-0006NF-KD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 16:52:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbMyQ-0007BA-Q3; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:51:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbMyN-0007Ad-4c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:51:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rbMyM-0000g7-Pe; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 10:51:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Dx8/fRuBkJtnT9QYiQn1sm2u/BilB9L3B6JWfd1+ZDI=; b=Pck9Js+HQ2xd i77lEgmmZq50FakXuxxz5RTr04kKvzfN53FV9T1xSpmVGFBD+DCR1fQus3pfdeZmKDC9soFuUz+/h +myE/VS0cHKJyFp3XWbbjgdFZPKhYxJwsffYiXJv2r/s0xXlv7oAXWWVqujmgsK6gtnGdwQhdrQkk LQUABcGvy3tjbJrUDRhcE7Ex6jC46OdWyHiAYwuExa3WR665X1pAMchXS9HHsxamUP7nNVEMaJFsX o3/qYyE38GJa4wF1jyTy5vIlEYTAn/+M8f3S9NDfGWq2xWcK1dZRthu4qxk1PJ3gKGJD8uc1AHxXD /HiRL8l1OI+vgo2Kl8PpGg==; In-Reply-To: (message from JD Smith on Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:40:19 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316266 Archived-At: > From: JD Smith > Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:40:19 -0500 > > There was a recent discussion about which lisp/progmodes packages belong in core. A sentiment was > expressed that useful languages with non-negligible user bases should probably go in, and others should be > in ELPA. > > I want to bring up a related point: it should be possible to retire packages from core, once their relevance > drops below a critical threshold [1]. We usually first retire such packages to lisp/obsolete/. There, they are still available, but need to be loaded manually. Moving something directly to ELPA might be too drastic, assuming someone somewhere still want to use it.