From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69734: BUG: Inconsistent Emacs documentation... Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:44:04 +0200 Message-ID: <86jzm390u3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86zfv4u3b8.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30062"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 69734@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mikael Larsson Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 15 12:44:54 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5za-0007da-KZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:44:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5z9-0004py-Pn; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:44:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5z7-0004pY-Rm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:44:25 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5z7-00051a-Jk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:44:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5zh-0001Ap-Ks for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:45:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69734 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69734-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69734.17105030934473 (code B ref 69734); Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69734) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2024 11:44:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52199 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5zY-0001A4-Sa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:44:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5zW-00019n-TQ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:44:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rl5yq-0004xw-U5; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:44:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=uXwgMpRrbKgYaq8pw/SgEhwL4rXHtht7K9ig+DfVsJI=; b=ljeRiokxs6Ze Q2eOT6uoxiepxu8F2y3+MnfJFLfgmge5KuVOIcv08zKBk7qpodfvbhuVSUfw0fPD75Se8vT9+YadD Ceyg6BNf4RA9VIKlMbXeZcQAiaV30G4jeNiBF+uHmttkx5GBnhbupN94fsgTkkJDG/GnLdZLbMF25 EwH1ypCfpRjy6oNozECeLBSOa5M/xDVk+i848Hbo4h//Pgl4SZR3X2ZQCcW8hUOzdmJLlH2FU2Nrx RXbBRrTedhSwRA0MAhruVEMK9gC+Rtzi5UgFE61PhKqwA0uieO3gFm12MaVSC2Q8H6URWa5rdZwkh UizYSi59RjetFH3leOSriw==; In-Reply-To: (message from Mikael Larsson on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:49:26 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:281666 Archived-At: severity 69734 wishlist thanks Resending Mikael's response, which was sent only to me: > From: Mikael Larsson > Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:49:26 +0100 > > Hi Eli, > > Thank you for your reply! > A few comments on your answer: > Please consider making two PDFs available on the download page. The current one that is a copy of the > printed version and a new one with the full documentation. It's most convenient to have the full documentation > in PDF, making full search easy. This will also offload searches on your website as well. > > Kind regards and have a nice weekend, > Mikael Larsson Thank you for your comments. For now, we don't have the resources to produce two versions if each PDF manual, but maybe one day in the future. I've now converted this bug report to a feature request.