From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: scratch/igc as a feature branch [was: Re: igc: trying to chase a crash] Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:08:44 +0200 Message-ID: <86jzcog1dv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874j3v2lq3.fsf@telefonica.net> <864j3vi0d0.fsf@gnu.org> <87zfln1468.fsf@telefonica.net> <86zflngk0j.fsf@gnu.org> <87v7wb11hk.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23597"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, yandros@gmail.com, ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, pipcet@protonmail.com To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 27 16:09:18 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tGJfH-0005tJ-43 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:09:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tGJer-0006aj-Ta; Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:08:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tGJep-0006Pi-Cw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:08:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tGJep-0001N7-3q; Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:08:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=tjO2LCeZH0WZIeyvV9HIQoSG82HIasIG+GT2m3ERzHc=; b=QpLpbR5EatVzZnsIUA+M KMvlMTBCOK1nuMn5+bep0pf+y3mSADIpcdJchUkLURqRFF1mhF6Ex5v8TQV7WmmcTXqNgTdHcfkDT 7WlIe7ozhOKzMOxOKwPgrFOvMkmsKv66s0c1dkjFovPskHFarGaeuwjdDJrJvFYHk5/5+aC8cyb8i mx0Q/TPWQd+twuzP/HCf+3uy7o3p+MzXO59p/vKyHuopMddIYpKvaRCFpmTUWu5mVUOnhll/w1c6b LxW22FhDp0Fm4mjJ+yJ9rHVFXHaMgza+xLmafPfg977Sl1SOo0jUtb4oo8uRTcg+fYufiQRDnS9ZB VR53c85hnogQ7A==; In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Wed, 27 Nov 2024 05:18:08 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325775 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: chad , Óscar Fuentes , > emacs-devel@gnu.org, Pip Cet > Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 05:18:08 -0500 > > Gerd Möllmann writes: > > >> Absolutely, still I think few things are probably really low cost (the > >> feature branch comes to my mind). > >> > > > > Maintainers could just decide to do it, cough, cough :-). > > Maintainers could decide autonomously, but IMO is more about developers > of that branch being okay with the decision. The implications are, > other than the name change, not being able to force push. > > That said not only I'm okay with having scratch/icg being pushed as > feature/icg, but I long time suggested that :) The question is indeed what kind of trouble this could cause. If it loses the history, I wouldn't do it, since the fact that it's under scratch/ is not a catastrophe, IMO.