From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Prefer to split along the longest edge Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:32:28 +0200 Message-ID: <86jzbyo2oj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r06a3yfg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zfkx2ydr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8734io2hac.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r067imbg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9819"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, nicolas.despres@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 17 14:33:34 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXhc-0002O3-RO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:33:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXgj-0003S2-AE; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:32:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXgd-0003KZ-Jo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:32:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNXgc-0003zd-ET; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:32:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=BX1T8iuWlLQlB6TBkjAINFEkvgn8vgPJ5chHnjU1eks=; b=mVH9ViTX+mW/ A81aJZhtOj/eFoDWWhLZkac2iZfI4aeLbMXYx0Ch2pQFOkKvmVVYxKRr5/tN+nU3QqV6JH3xs9qRG nAMq3Aw1dtq2b4gmyTm6ZlwpqNU07+iC+xCcZr6tAZz3qpi4WoX7jF/wZHImkOP2fhLeg97GHBEdq 9N9XsFp5vz2qhH+mbLQb5EE4aCCk7u17Cme5HZMlPJZyudvCM1r0RYF4xY86xI5sFMTWmAuHoE+gL +hvAa5XX4ZzZ/VriZKPRG0o19FrxrGrnTCAP03sZPq2THJ4bC5ewok1/qX5zUlSmqXfsf1u2PPRfw 5iyoSGyVmtaK/MHilqaHow==; In-Reply-To: (message from martin rudalics on Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:01:01 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326592 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:01:01 +0100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > > >> It basically does that: > >> > >> if width > height: > >> try to split horizontally, then try to split vertically > > The only thing I can say is that for some time people strongly opposed > the idea of splitting windows side by side by default. It's possible > that this attitude has changed by now. Not here, it didn't. Maybe because I'm not in the widespread business of making every frame full-screen, or even close. But given a user options, personal preferences can be easily accounted for.