From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jules Tamagnan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23609: 25.0.92; Python eldoc freeze Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:39:03 -0400 Message-ID: <86inxzxs54.fsf@gmail.com> References: <867fejo4g2.fsf@gmail.com> <57454201.10607@easy-emacs.de> <86bn3umahs.fsf@gmail.com> <5745C5D9.50701@easy-emacs.de> <861t4orf3h.fsf@gmail.com> <834m9k3hmz.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpmg229w.fsf@gnu.org> <86mvncpwso.fsf@gmail.com> <83d1o726si.fsf@gnu.org> <86lh2vo4yd.fsf@gmail.com> <727af3c6-091a-6f06-b2c0-6777532c1728@yandex.ru> <86h9djo25l.fsf@gmail.com> <42b81dc0-01be-57c9-4457-ad27c31b2df2@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464374428 16056 80.91.229.3 (27 May 2016 18:40:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 18:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23609@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 27 20:40:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Mg9-0005mD-Aa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 20:40:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47370 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Mg8-00080H-FC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:40:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Mg2-0007wl-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:40:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Mfy-0002vm-Qv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:40:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58733) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Mfy-0002vT-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Mfy-0002Cj-FZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jules Tamagnan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 18:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23609 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23609-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23609.14643743528392 (code B ref 23609); Fri, 27 May 2016 18:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23609) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2016 18:39:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b6MfA-0002BI-Hk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:39:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:36504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Mf8-0002B2-CI for 23609@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:39:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id x7so85455302qkd.3 for <23609@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:39:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=YhpJgHy7dKEwfj/RHi18jNhr5zZSFhobbYsBI1IW10o=; b=p1cS2ERJFaFa3t2SH17kut6/+jC9hLfRUcDYoz5OYoHBS+rreq1Ib1eAMCdqwGsbGW eiSMj015CnJubVTe5/roIIBi4FjEtGDMVcn5ARN0AvlUYZmapr423FUN0E9SSJNSStao Oa5EvXMFBv6j7CLCuNGI1leFLGxWiLN+8YbKh+xF05+DXn3iFYesypP2ZMahiuHRdTn/ qShB6VvWL1ZC1+xXe338VHgDkEkW3LhE8yAOhnShvg3Z0Mx/dbLQmwcE0RKDuBaUOkTf gakrUE/GNeJF6wQSrC2HQER+nx5MprtEEYXNTvFysctE9R0IYwQ9EWmmBcjQQjD71JBQ RQXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=YhpJgHy7dKEwfj/RHi18jNhr5zZSFhobbYsBI1IW10o=; b=ieNmBr9Ge1MILjcJnZUZGBxE6rF0gtmfxQrbEWiUmoLhAAsVf1sXfIuZabRlyNw4vR 5jgj11IS64nGlbZCpjkDBSNUNj27k894Afp4mAiIH2yUYeBe/wB6RTpydAANh3PlB2OC H1ZuYXZsVTq6DL4Bhfrb6aBdLdq0YpDklSVDfgt7y7agBmokUBvZoS1xXUQKNjl2BHV6 DcXGB3mRxNv0HO55pRU6OkFsD9ZGlq+ZuvMoN/H7WKllrG6+1mzLmZDworP8/YsOp0E9 ssS22ZM5a06R4USACEqqDJ6Ufz5dpaxT4uQ4niKpd3XNLBqDSVqZaUhwkXA1VsXuWPyU T/tA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK4ibUzAcKa44fUATnfLzeiTQqrOAQSShveOCv3zykprZ4+heNGrroSQc7gyozn2w== X-Received: by 10.200.49.119 with SMTP id h52mr15311394qtb.80.1464374344772; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bandersnatch ([130.132.236.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y129sm5598542qka.33.2016.05.27.11.39.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 May 2016 11:39:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <42b81dc0-01be-57c9-4457-ad27c31b2df2@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Fri, 27 May 2016 21:26:09 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118772 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 05/27/2016 08:12 PM, Jules Tamagnan wrote: > >> I thought that this would make it clearer and easier to check if the >> automatic eldoc check was disabled. Also easier to reset if somebody >> wanted to. Python-eldoc-function isn't interactive and is not used >> anywhere else so I didn't think it would be a big issue if it were >> simply disabled > > OK, that makes sense. I think it'd be better to make that variable > private, though. So we don't have to carry it on after the bug is > fixed properly. What do you mean by private? Thanks