From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?andr=C3=A9s_ram=C3=ADrez?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 19:16:05 +0000 Organization: bien.comun.org Message-ID: <86imid3fre.fsf@gmail.com> References: <834ku43c61.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200404104553.GA5329@ACM> <07fe3b69-3ab2-3173-0696-cb17809e2b91@gmx.at> <83blo7v68b.fsf@gnu.org> <1845d7aa-9ae4-3d95-6a30-c7b1d8d8adec@gmx.at> <83a73qt6zs.fsf@gnu.org> <97c4254e-ff43-8402-3645-f713c408c245@gmx.at> <83y2r9syby.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv1xsset.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnclsqew.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="18190"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 05 21:16:43 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAl9-0004eE-Dx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 21:16:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAl8-0005zB-G9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 15:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAke-0005Zu-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 15:16:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAkd-0004ox-59 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 15:16:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ua1-x929.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::929]:35448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLAkc-0004o1-Vo; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 15:16:11 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ua1-x929.google.com with SMTP id a6so4725881uao.2; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 12:16:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:organization:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=xQF27/CU1UzNJVbyGYP6BFyMTZ2IOaZ9gwdolWrTTuk=; b=uazOQryS5gNNv1Y/QV/4YxpOcviTnoTjj8zFqQkQGGJsNEvLVEzP4EuKskAsJc9ZX/ HVmkS616Brdv73RLFqpy0pwvxEJEHsePF8mp8JyzJGPs/9uMWi1HY/8HSL47qO+sSvKG Ri9mhCDK+JffL4X5UTX9GMVzoYqW7TEe6VVXQrnxGHeouynjWUcZdV5Zq2X7PKfX7w25 nLptzwANxpTHQUJgEtr333qG2cxlUdUq0aiCD6nANcoKirGpLvUw30mLTUHe6E87epuO MfDo2uKrhFMatsi2mssqAURBrcsMaifcXbOaFj+2skGkeIH6s0qjqPOzqrAJas5fdhA9 kNDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:organization :references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=xQF27/CU1UzNJVbyGYP6BFyMTZ2IOaZ9gwdolWrTTuk=; b=kQEw0zqdp0KR0YaZtRrNH/ERtcxoI/MYXblKmhLmrXPECsAxAg8V/XBkjJsxuShHnK kEfa6ejWFcE+BFNXS1aPqFGxBhx1j+BchofSbPUBi9SgNYklGwJeZeSxsFkrIUUUcKkG Q+CaJdAqJGnVpXiIHmmWmxU2NDxrJd3LxvgHd125H5wws0mHQ08KE4xrJY2DaI9g/CRl gIfI63VPKdTVZHp2SYZF9l1Y41aNSQnXDXbVn/jLgwEmDyy7Q+6q7JN9Y3or3oH0ddVD sr2exY/zxBJYM41MoE9XazSndm2H6686hZ4dLfJzbSchFuNk6VHRXL1ze5H3uCVEexzf p4PQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYq2ok1eegZuGA+lAqvR7JTSe2CASlnJ56ne5CkZM/+NHlPoELU GO8SnlVcUjjLSAozpUzU73VQpP19S0c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLoqVVR48Yo6eoaefGidarOKY5/7Z6kCM/7aLZeyACDfqPNJGVqgPzAbthncl4zMIrNjzdqWQ== X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2e:: with SMTP id 43mr13549944uai.36.1586114169711; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 12:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from sacsa.n800.arm.processor.yandex.fm ([190.236.255.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w131sm4091226vke.8.2020.04.05.12.16.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 05 Apr 2020 12:16:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83pnclsqew.fsf@gnu.org> X-Attribution: INKA X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::929 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246485 Archived-At: Hi. >> What's the difference between redisplay being slow and it being >> unable to "keep up"? I don't understand, sorry. Eli> That's not the important difference. The important difference is Eli> that you want the input processed faster, without waiting for Eli> slow redisplay. I remember the other day someone on this list. Having a very similar issue as described above. Eli mentioned something about his graphic card. But. It happens to me, when I have mesa-git with glamor enabled. Whet I create an emacs lucid frame and move to the scratch buffer and I write the character 'w' (and also other identified characters but 'w' is the worst case) that character is duplicated and also emacs lags for a few seconds. It happens also with emacs23. On those cases I fire up qemacs or xemacs or sxemacs those do not have the same issue. Best Regards