From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Code for cond* Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:38:16 +0200 Message-ID: <86il3hd7fr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874jf3rkzx.fsf@yahoo.com> <87le8ehqew.fsf@localhost> <87zfwurjv4.fsf@yahoo.com> <87cytqhn35.fsf@localhost> <87r0i6rfjg.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jf2hkxo.fsf@localhost> <87frymre9b.fsf@yahoo.com> <871qa6hjtq.fsf@localhost> <87y1ceeoo3.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87o7d9pysz.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30014"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 25 11:39:23 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rSx8k-0007dO-Gp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:39:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSx7m-0000L2-It; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:38:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSx7l-0000Kt-KG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:38:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSx7l-0002Wq-AX; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:38:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=NmrBmpOgug8Kw/cO/AwwLmNlmg573ZfAQvAxCTFrtnI=; b=eLmhhTF34Fw7 SVa+p7iWpfqLSZM3e1k1uyAxqK+G2wlVyq8VQ2oxzTQobggio7Stcay4xwruwBTucBSqUkeha/HB6 uOGNVlQ8YjspUTuxnw7PyHJCa2c4XwiQ+y4LxOEp4+2rMbJxYPphWACoaxzhaHK6i8pD1jQysTxmw 3gHZkEM76aSCixmaS6ICKEMvly3pRT76UM/d91xLpYm41zlaB9qQU/E17zkMoQmsx6m54DVsvB7J4 hH+SFNbo1U6VXtz1KWnjI3Tkk2z9jz80a/ZCPmZhQz0uO3db/I8Om/JJaqG8Jvf7aiXDNF7A6G01x eepu59kp2X9InqvnaEydlg==; In-Reply-To: (ams@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315344 Archived-At: > From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 04:55:24 -0500 > > If you think COND* is better, argue for it using technical arguments. > Someones health issues have literally no bearing on if something is to > be added, to live in ELPA or something else. > > So please stop don't continue this thread using that line of emotional > tangents, it is not useful. I would actually ask everyone except the Emacs maintainers to avoid wording which could be interpreted as expressing the views or policies of the project. Many people who read this list only occasionally don't know who is and who isn't speaking for the project, and thus they misinterpret messages that express opinions to be policy or something that's about to become policy. This then causes misunderstandings, unnecessary messages, potential flame wars, articles in other forums that spread fake news about us, etc. Please try to avoid those negative effects by wording your opinions correspondingly and/or making clear you don't speak for the project. TIA