From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing 'safety' compilation parameter Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 18:10:14 +0300 Message-ID: <86ikzl4sa1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86a5kz74yw.fsf@gnu.org> <86ttj63r96.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9828"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, mattias.engdegard@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 10 17:11:23 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s5Ru6-0002Le-OQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 10 May 2024 17:11:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5RtL-0003US-Rd; Fri, 10 May 2024 11:10:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5RtJ-0003UF-Bn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2024 11:10:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5RtH-0006Mh-5X; Fri, 10 May 2024 11:10:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=CtH4KLA19Uzpi9kUmjKertFukO0l5wDqtOZBP/2Xe8Y=; b=afKw5IofFyIw IblGzgds0OK43OdOW3Pq5X6SmnkJcpHVa20l8na3jCsmzul/obrvvp4PSQers3mwmajZTyqB4qMYn T23W5nXI6eONFrnz0gwllVb/f9eeKoLQTOqdfQ2zN/tiAqlnMlFCJPy8BFZXm451iXAm17btZsfSg C3i9gaHjomWvMyzUSsv4HxJ3RZRH4zoH2CbO2DMefsLrz9zqJnW4mEHEmAJjEPEY/ApAep4U66JYE ApjappzFllGmk+UCTeB6/iYzqtdSrd4pLVa1HNnb4p2XeCv1g8teNheDNxMemqOi5/bKqZpC9AUXh 11RozupFhqeWv5WSBBu4QQ==; In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Fri, 10 May 2024 07:42:16 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319142 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > mattias.engdegard@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 07:42:16 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> > Is this for Emacs 30 or Emacs 31? > >> > >> Hi Eli, > >> > >> the question is related to the patch or the defaul value? > > > > Both. > > ATM the default is the equivalent to the proposed 0 (and so it was since > the introduction of native compilation). > > The proposal is for 30 but if it's too late it's for 31 :) I didn't (yet) say it was too late, I just said that if we want this in Emacs 30, we need top conclude this discussion soon enough.