From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:59:02 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86iky0m8xh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9391"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Daniel Colascione , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 23 09:26:29 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sLHcK-0002Gr-6Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 09:26:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sLHbY-0000EW-Ot; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 03:25:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sLHbW-0000D9-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 03:25:38 -0400 Original-Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::228]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sLHbV-0001kT-45 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 03:25:38 -0400 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1F701BF203; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 07:25:29 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:03:55 -0400") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::228; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay8-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320501 Archived-At: > A few years ago, Daniel suggested: >> Likewise, for windmove, we can bind C-x 4 {left, right, up, down} and DWIM >> for people automatically, enabled by default. > > AFAICT we still don't actually provide any keybindings for the windmove > commands by default. Did I miss a controversy about that, or did it > just fall through the cracks? > > [ I mean, I assume there are different opinions about which set of keybindings > is the best, but it seems to me that it should not be that hard to > find a default set of keybindings that's better than no keybindings > at all. ] The arrow keys have a good mnemonic for windmove-display-in-direction.