From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 21:29:26 +0300 Message-ID: <86ikxnbqbd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875xto7lbn.fsf@dancol.org> <86ed8ce2mh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <81b620d7-18a6-4c6e-8517-147a411ee882@gutov.dev> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37026"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, dancol@dancol.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 02 20:30:31 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sOiGs-0009Oc-VI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 20:30:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOiGH-0006d4-61; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:29:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOiGE-0006ch-45 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:29:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOiG6-00086J-4h; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:29:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=0ZPO6uOAOthJBE7xGLNoovcRghju8r2HxnL7OWz0YxY=; b=Ffn6qDxlmSvA rLml3SDvSZTUnvSq6HUAVQd1uxaRDBrjYPGr7ZnYmhANgXh25fLiMcsfIpN+uIFHQwFC/6KJ1Ie+D 3XAwXNDwqmgyFriCFjqguqDNmuV631ClXPXkfWs9thALSnsUF7B0fnAUL86v1xeHzZ2AopxH8uRD7 LZ0zGWO12vATJYJPpugm5BPxTIWUckl9iBTQHeJKOfV5EznCo12uZf2XZ7cqsFZtShgS6afiSbZ/r SGeRoeE8fS3M0DpnhiftkHorDX9ZqRTVPkn0BsdfyKH1Cs0qme7ikA3dUxfnZHBkNz8Z/EkYysPmn EQn1idLUv01MhzPnTcOQLQ==; In-Reply-To: <81b620d7-18a6-4c6e-8517-147a411ee882@gutov.dev> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 2 Jul 2024 21:03:43 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321196 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 21:03:43 +0300 > Cc: Stefan Kangas , > Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > > I can't believe someone might want to use such long key sequences > > for one of the most frequent actions. It's even longer than > > 'C-x o' it's supposed to improve. I think there are no better keys > > for switching windows than arrows with a modifier. > > I'm going to ask a dangerous question: do people use the existing > bindings for "C-x " and "C-x "? Yes.