From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#72769: 31.0.50; info-pop-to-buffer should respect display-buffer-alist Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 09:58:15 +0300 Message-ID: <86ikvrraig.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wmk7er9q.fsf@> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35517"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 72769@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Bidar Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 23 08:59:30 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1shOGe-00094d-3j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:59:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shOGU-0005IC-B6; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:59:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shOGR-0005Hz-NS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:59:15 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shOGR-0001x7-Et for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:59:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=XdTK8g0bctRML1bKKSofo51Zp1S00j3IiBuP2B20woQ=; b=Vq2Mk6yCnpCk4BVuNSd7jjeX4UPthsC+QA9dDns3+jMRXqc2xx2eFtvfAf1ZPuWe1cBzckaCActfx9rsYAurKuuizkuR8nUwSzwUkJtL6drM3ZDrIFZnUYdA1yCa5xO442MUgflVxBB8KLgNoqLwv6m9yiquyS6B9c7JCn4TSMsohbFimdas+2T7r4FGir+aTTTHa0FBWi+wdcgeowxCVen9VhAvqGEIz037KKrodoYR8ZDJs3x8jlv0dkmVUNmPgvPl4YiqrC3mLypZVjmQfTBb/s+qhxm/OjS8NYycAjGHxxJaUHfcqC1zldr6iSOmGZKpnDF2JyXOFO5NCd8u2g==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1shOHC-0006Bs-76 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 03:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 07:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 72769 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 72769-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B72769.172439635123677 (code B ref 72769); Fri, 23 Aug 2024 07:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 72769) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2024 06:59:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38849 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1shOGN-00069p-F6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:59:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55146) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1shOGL-00069Z-HS for 72769@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:59:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1shOFV-0001rH-E6; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:58:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=XdTK8g0bctRML1bKKSofo51Zp1S00j3IiBuP2B20woQ=; b=hHr/ModgxbZuptB/U1hL 7XwFfgF3/NMLUK5xqA1vASIloEKN+XfckodnshEYCMwqsv/6Sbt4SIAmMP5M207Zszs57UwRFq2WY i6uP/pavIa7vJgNT8gYYktVPIhQnCDSY+YS6yLQ2ZjIjbCVjlFceYeGb30RJIzBI+ztyEgDqx73dz ojb4f4k8UOnI0xM2+DxFGGVNNmGF/8xrUvR965fUWBic65e8PU5vizeJHLvQYP3EfwMR4b2cyzfQb 1DvtGP7K8Mf7vUDZjRfXI3/Fge7etzgvBZiXjskGObZlTNrPKRBmseSPAMYlIBTJHA/ihj/MUnvOx Cf2G3NgvjjFcEQ==; In-Reply-To: <87wmk7er9q.fsf@> (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:290579 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 08:34:41 +0300 > From: Björn Bidar via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > When calling Info directly it's possible to enforce to e.g. open info in > another window. > However when using functions such as info-display-manual this approach > doesn't work. > It would be better if info-pop-to-buffer generally would respect > display-buffer unless other-window is t. > > The easiest option would be to remove the display-buffer-same-window > flag however I don't how important it would be to keep the old > behavior. > Should info respect display-buffer-alist or is there a reason it shouldn't? I'd like to ask the opposite: are there any reasons to change the current behavior? This command existed for quite some time, and no one has complained about its behavior so far. Consistency by itself is not a reason good enough to make such changes, so are there other reasons? Thanks.