From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pdumper on Solaris 10 Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 05:28:44 +0200 Message-ID: <86ikrtedqr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878qwuitbu.fsf@yahoo.com> <87jzcajrnz.fsf@protonmail.com> <875xnthdtz.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24040"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, ali_gnu2@emvision.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 09 04:29:38 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tKUSn-0006A9-AY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 04:29:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tKUS1-0007Wc-56; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 22:28:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tKURz-0007W4-C9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 22:28:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tKURz-0003SJ-2B; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 22:28:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Qbm9n6oXXTR03XCDJvOnF8Fp2QBeJ9LkmHZXoRCxMQo=; b=PUksUUKj7Lig ayfFLpTikpIWg06/aisLDMva6aQ5utecoRgJVqda/o+3fzsOpLlaB/iF1qcxU+twId+8S3GBsvd7V vjRB/Bi6yPpZIoj1CTU3+k5Q/lPpoeqCeHErglqA7WunaqMff3WBPKC2PSlhTyDnE5xOOLQBlv0Z2 SL3qqKcMkNh0DsMT1fD47w0RXUGcrUNnGHIoLvwt2B8EJZuJgIgj3FSnYgfnsi0GqtY5lya5o6ol6 qDcWtRIDnr8YChC8jXNGIGIDx1STv5oMSkBpWRpzo3aA0zBI4QXkWADRcKhpB0AZydkwAb7224O4g enhCA/m3s5MobUEojAULOw==; In-Reply-To: <875xnthdtz.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:58:32 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326229 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: ali_gnu2@emvision.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:58:32 +0800 > > Pip Cet writes: > > > But while we're talking about rare and unusual systems, !USE_LSB builds > > are currently broken except for the WIDE_EMACS_INT case, because the > > stack scanning code makes no attempt to remove MSB tags. It may be time > > to simply remove MSB tag support, unless there are systems around that > > actually fail to align static objects to 8-byte boundaries (but such > > systems would have been broken for a while now). > > Aren't the MS-DOS builds !USE_LSB? No.