From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jules Tamagnan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23609: 25.0.92; Python eldoc freeze Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:12:54 -0400 Message-ID: <86h9djo25l.fsf@gmail.com> References: <867fejo4g2.fsf@gmail.com> <57454201.10607@easy-emacs.de> <86bn3umahs.fsf@gmail.com> <5745C5D9.50701@easy-emacs.de> <861t4orf3h.fsf@gmail.com> <834m9k3hmz.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpmg229w.fsf@gnu.org> <86mvncpwso.fsf@gmail.com> <83d1o726si.fsf@gnu.org> <86lh2vo4yd.fsf@gmail.com> <727af3c6-091a-6f06-b2c0-6777532c1728@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464369331 924 80.91.229.3 (27 May 2016 17:15:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23609@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 27 19:15:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b6LLs-0000Nw-Us for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 19:15:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47112 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6LLs-0004Q2-5f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:15:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6LKo-0003eW-Eu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:14:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6LKk-0006OJ-8B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6LKk-0006OF-4F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b6LKj-0006zt-Th for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:14:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jules Tamagnan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23609 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23609-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23609.146436918526814 (code B ref 23609); Fri, 27 May 2016 17:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23609) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2016 17:13:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42796 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b6LJp-0006yQ-BW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:13:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f182.google.com ([209.85.220.182]:34715) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b6LJn-0006xv-DT for 23609@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f182.google.com with SMTP id y126so83889659qke.1 for <23609@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:13:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=DQ0sq4m5tlo1kqjAA30bV4KV2mJi5tBUW73xKqP06hk=; b=o9+DB9/2lUmcmw4Cq1lFZOMcsn23p8h7dDQgnTMHdiDRd2ERBRRGwRXO+zKOdm28Hr JwyRUO/GSMQ1lwi7ieLaXpIPSwdgteIkHtrAzPtjDmljRFOWFwS4q0vLSJuWQ/bbFH7e PaPEkO+YQl/PV1aq9rl4lrtRDhNIzQSxL1A5P4aXCh78Tib5edjUkVxwVfxB0XiGtTfU q830SHcQ8eIT7N2hirnc+sSkgAp/mx9z0Yukjnuv5uC7tJDo9O0ciOfmAuqsJ0kBtt4q mBsUOwaGxwGslIHeS7W1caXdvBEqe8nMDPoXxOOWnyTK+76GfF4wcRXyWOG6TF6DeHlW fvPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=DQ0sq4m5tlo1kqjAA30bV4KV2mJi5tBUW73xKqP06hk=; b=a3zFayzKk4gVXQZmiShYDWWe0leL9szP2YOq+Lq31AmXfyO1DzYoZz253bvhpNPdc8 hRwyF4PloXCEXRn9aObBlpXp3sOjZ0cP9D40lJRhWHpbHUDRIkZXd/CyeSmNoVsm3jFb 0uM45yvh6uTGN65u+0r2qpaymaLZ+tfeyfJA/bqJ75ol7+TJx6Rz5ueniQ80FgT356KT CMFOSHyoKADsUfKNcIZlB0CwhO7ekxzJdeSRMxBXTXZUHZUeaPCObDJxNeBfH1vy5S8m FqWmlDjGu7kCy9WbdA2pUUi45qSYPx4LZXKWSlKYUyEshLNU2mioy3rm3JvmgdprXTZ8 qqlw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLFCb9SsiBOAybtAKl/2t9LpTTVEMGNj7g8bwB8wMpj8W2ppHyExicN4RjKOjSB4g== X-Received: by 10.55.90.130 with SMTP id o124mr15198206qkb.178.1464369176004; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:12:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bandersnatch ([130.132.236.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y67sm5461389qhb.43.2016.05.27.10.12.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 May 2016 10:12:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <727af3c6-091a-6f06-b2c0-6777532c1728@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Fri, 27 May 2016 19:18:21 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118768 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 05/27/2016 07:12 PM, Jules Tamagnan wrote: > >> +(defvar-local python-eldoc-get-doc t >> + "If eldoc should be used to get the documentation automatically") > > Why not unset/un-advise eldoc-documentation-function instead? > > A new variable doesn't seem necessary. Having python-eldoc-function do > nothing in certain cases, on the other hand, might look puzzling. I thought that this would make it clearer and easier to check if the automatic eldoc check was disabled. Also easier to reset if somebody wanted to. Python-eldoc-function isn't interactive and is not used anywhere else so I didn't think it would be a big issue if it were simply disabled