From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building the igc branch on MS-Windows Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 09:13:19 +0300 Message-ID: <86h6fnxri8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86il063imh.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttjqghyd.fsf@gmail.com> <86zfti101u.fsf@gnu.org> <87pluegd4z.fsf@gmail.com> <86ttjp20je.fsf@gnu.org> <87y191fwnd.fsf@gmail.com> <87cyqcfv6k.fsf@gmail.com> <86o79wzi31.fsf@gnu.org> <86mspgza23.fsf@gnu.org> <86a5lgz7qa.fsf@gnu.org> <87mspgfj6b.fsf@yahoo.com> <864jboyyak.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24441"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 27 08:13:51 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s0bJm-0006AX-UG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:13:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0bJM-00063C-Uo; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 02:13:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0bJK-00062M-Fj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 02:13:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s0bJK-0006hk-6p; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 02:13:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ZH0qE/vP1gaU/bHrZTeHeTOPYCeS/+aOPgr7ee7gVB4=; b=mCUIZvklTjxw q5qdkUordydCHkL86t8Dk+2shJGMDC4dRu6IPCJIyOWdruu08gvDSid9Z0y5BoJZpkcPcqVotkVXm ei3VnvjUMleT1n8iYEKMv495R/F3XQcHL08XznfAWNAiRofCHFZS/FmB7TAKEVT7wagc+vQQgg8Jq a6W+s1SspXcbq2Orn6oIRFaJVwypKuc+uKhZC+BVHGFCf92MLas23XPsDekNtRcyGsTbOMOlNXjLB vc7xpWBvxB7bwYbMPeyULcW7TzPZmEkyJZPkWrxRu4QhEZPMRA2hAfisD5ljBC9noolScj7/MNgQ7 x9k0Jr2xvSDwXeU1hGAMDg==; In-Reply-To: (message from Po Lu on Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:21:19 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:318162 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:21:19 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Even if that is true, how does this matter after Emacs crashed? > > Especially if that happened due to MPS assertion violation? > > bt is called in plenty of situations besides an irrecoverable crash. Which obviously means we should modify "xbacktrace" to notice when Emacs has crashed, and act accordingly.