From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cl-defgeneric vs random funcall in project.el Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 09:24:13 -0500 Message-ID: <86fv4782k2.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <86oaiwa57v.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55B79B3F.1060200@yandex.ru> <86wpxj93r2.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <55B82A0C.5040709@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438179919 20423 80.91.229.3 (29 Jul 2015 14:25:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:25:19 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 29 16:25:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKSI4-0006b9-MW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 16:25:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35475 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKSHy-0006nr-N6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:24:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKSHj-0006gr-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:24:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKSHf-0004jg-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:24:43 -0400 Original-Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.33.93]:47622) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKSHf-0004iQ-Kj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:24:39 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 9489 invoked by uid 0); 29 Jul 2015 14:24:33 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2015 14:24:33 -0000 Original-Received: from host114.hostmonster.com ([74.220.207.114]) by cmgw4 with id yEQT1q0052UdiVW01EQWZa; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:24:33 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OJm0g0qB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:117 a=CQdxDb2CKd3SRg4I0/XZPQ==:17 a=DsvgjBjRAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=9i_RQKNPAAAA:8 a=y7kgw_RnJtkA:10 a=hEr_IkYJT6EA:10 a=x_XPkuGwIRMA:10 a=zOBTXjUuO1YA:10 a=vaJtXVxTAAAA:8 a=Fthm2_5qUkZpgrr4OasA:9 Original-Received: from [76.218.37.33] (port=52079 helo=TAKVER2) by host114.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKSHS-000180-MX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:24:26 -0600 In-Reply-To: <55B82A0C.5040709@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2015 04:19:08 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (windows-nt) X-Identified-User: {2442:host114.hostmonster.com:stephele:stephe-leake.org} {sentby:smtp auth 76.218.37.33 authed with stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org} X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 67.222.33.93 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188164 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 07/29/2015 04:00 AM, Stephen Leake wrote: > >>> However, now that we've reached the consensus that project-search-path >>> doesn't need to include the directories inside the current project, >> >> I never agreed to that. In fact, I thought the only thing we _did_ agree >> on was that project-search-path included the main project. Sigh. > > Seriously? Here's a quote from one of your messages: > > """ > So some specific change proposals: > > - Rename 'project-directories' to 'project-root-directories' or > 'project-roots'. The current project root should always be first in > the list. > > - 'project-search-path' should not include 'project-root-directories'. > """ That means the _code_ for default method for the function project-search-path should not append the value of the result of the function project-root-directories. It says nothing about the _meaning_ of the concept "project-search-path", nor the result of the function pointed to by project-search-path-function; it is free to include whatever directories it wants. The point was I thought that project-search-path and project-directories were distinct concepts, not related to each other. The contents may overlap, or either one may not be defined. Now that I see that you intended them to mean project-path-read-only and project-path-read-write, things have changed. -- -- Stephe