From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69521: 29.1; Adding a DECLARE spec equivalent to DECLARE-FUNCTION Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 13:18:14 +0200 Message-ID: <86frx7o96x.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6212"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 69521@debbugs.gnu.org To: Adam Porter Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 03 12:22:05 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rgjuu-0001Nk-Fa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 12:22:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgjuR-000427-5k; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 06:21:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgjuP-00041q-Mh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 06:21:33 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgjuP-0001yi-Ei for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 06:21:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgjus-0005Px-1V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 06:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69521 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69521-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69521.170946487120746 (code B ref 69521); Sun, 03 Mar 2024 11:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69521) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2024 11:21:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39836 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgju2-0005OT-GD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 06:21:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgjtx-0005Nm-NX; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 06:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgjrH-0000kK-UE; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 06:18:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=RNk3inunL4o+rDe8iy39q6eEb5wpf+Vp8EBRS63jz+M=; b=NwjS2lYTWD/v KOCWpIRsDPRjiCe8fYZyKE2x6pE1m9D68DREzM4RZg++2eTBgTs5XTF19NEAqfisBQpL8YzwKboCI M55omGZ1JAxh+aaZ/u6U7/6t0+BNCjApg1o0lZb+wp4d9pHyGg8HpC6mCNIafzVESqJ7uWTpiQjz2 N3+DMhbZydSeC62idNxLqcuJloKPJ8bZmkQ1Wsc7CA1xn9ue7Fkr7UnUpyDJlTOFWUTjPr9Q3jT7l R01cJRUuoX2Z7U4rQmVBBENAWEhFUMYeAS4DkbETLIX3rHMwzLYippcYaF7BdmSljBdqcTAdhzkRb /CChHl1u2MJ2gSJXtR0qlQ==; In-Reply-To: (message from Adam Porter on Sun, 3 Mar 2024 04:49:02 -0600) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280934 Archived-At: severity 69521 wishlist thanks > Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 04:49:02 -0600 > From: Adam Porter > > In light of [this thread], this seems like a good time to propose this > idea: to enhance the `declare' form with a `function' spec equivalent to > the top-level `declare-function' form. This allows keeping the > declaration inside the function that makes it necessary, which has a few > advantages: Thanks, but I think this should be discussed on emacs-devel first. The bug tracker is not a good vessel of discussing ideas; in particular. quite a few of people who should be part of such a discussion don't read bug-gnu-emacs regularly, and must be explicitly CC'ed to take notice. So I suggest to start the discussion on emacs-devel, and only switch here if/when the idea and its implementation aspects are clear enough to post a patch. Thanks.