From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master updated (31e8500b061 -> 04e8ad6489e) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:33:44 +0300 Message-ID: <86frq3k79j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <172616480089.7302.12250649684752047951@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <878qvwkluq.fsf@gmail.com> <86mskbkeqs.fsf@gnu.org> <874j6jlpqn.fsf@gmail.com> <87zfobk9wb.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33868"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 13 15:34:09 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sp6R7-0008cW-I9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 15:34:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sp6Qy-00047z-3n; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:34:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sp6Qs-00047e-FJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sp6Qq-0004yZ-Fv; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:33:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=htexJzKRk/56VIaW7SPu3cMprSe3vOuo4wGk244H3xk=; b=l6tLnkihqFzb v6Tp46Z2Pn3qtjENRmwVF4SAlH5vlMReF4XKRyfpKNKAD0q39+KfzoZC1PURjSGtWYhrghHgbKm3q 6y5n1ViVhfmPX6ZNvli0n6h6/I9hadfl9w/ftbXIKSWcT7br5+FRS/BEDxPonfXCVswkY8Q0ykh5x Te7J6YvjjSYhRq/Gsv2kEGnuCdqskNUvezWpsD60/u0KaHxS25/7E3l91hYXe/+s3HY+Ipi9BvAC0 CYwqRin0PMWH9Jg12pitBFElNP1ndNXCHQ7/l40L6G7k8VFMHvG0mrlgg0MAa3M3kHoc1V/GYQq2z ryuxwvJ+quYy27UB0JxiYw==; In-Reply-To: <87zfobk9wb.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:36:52 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323592 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:36:52 +0200 > > >>>>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:09:20 +0200, Robert Pluim said: > > BTW, is it worth updating admin/unicode/README? I can do that. I guess so, but please either make it so the file doesn't need to be updated each time we import a new Unicode version, or if that is impossible, add to admin/notes/unicode some verbiage to the effect that README should be updated. Thanks.