From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar repository Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:55:51 +0100 Message-ID: <86ejae96t4.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <87skyvse7k.fsf@xmission.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205409389 25124 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2008 11:56:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar@lists.canonical.com, Jason Earl , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 12:56:57 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZm3M-0004sW-P0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:56:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZm2n-0003iN-Sy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:56:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZm2O-0003WR-Ta for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:55:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZm2N-0003UU-2Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:55:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZm2M-0003UH-RM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:55:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.quinscape.de ([212.29.44.217]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZm2L-0000vZ-T7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:55:54 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail-ldap/ctrl 18356 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2008 11:55:52 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by ns.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Mar 2008 11:55:51 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3957B8FBB3; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:55:50 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:43:42 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.1.3-2; AVE: 7.6.0.73; VDF: 7.0.3.23; host: quinx) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92400 gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:38446 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > My first impression is that bzr is slow, so slow that it is completely > unusable. How can it come that a simple bzr log takes more than a > minute to even start? Even cvs log is instantaneous in comparison, > although it has to request the log from the server. I find this surprising: "git log" is pretty much instantaneous, and git recalculates a code piece's history in the process (renaming and copying is not tracked by git, but calculated on the fly when you ask for log output). In contrast, one has to tell Bazaar IIRC when one copies or moves or renames files, so it should have the information available right away. -- David Kastrup