From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bignum branch Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:54:34 +0100 Message-ID: <86efffgr9h.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87o9fbbw1t.fsf@tromey.com> <86in5jdj49.fsf@gmail.com> <83wotxaiwi.fsf@gnu.org> <86k1pxmvmx.fsf@gmail.com> <87efg4a9xc.fsf@tromey.com> <87a7qr8cz7.fsf@tromey.com> <86tvoy3je9.fsf@gmail.com> <86bmb0vbxf.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1pnfcg1.fsf@tromey.com> <86sh4b1833.fsf@gmail.com> <861sbgz3dm.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7q4ufxp.fsf@gnu.org> <86in4resc8.fsf@gmail.com> <831sbfvl11.fsf@gnu.org> <8636vv7ohh.fsf@gmail.com> <83y3dntwsw.fsf@gnu.org> <83wot7tkdh.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533326001 20100 195.159.176.226 (3 Aug 2018 19:53:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:53:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (windows-nt) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 03 21:53:17 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flg8T-00058U-95 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 21:53:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52880 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flgAZ-0002lw-Vj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 15:55:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47161) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flg9x-0002lq-M6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 15:54:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flg9t-0003Au-QS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 15:54:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=45778 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flg9t-0003AP-J0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 15:54:45 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flg7j-0004SW-Df for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 21:52:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:9d9TZJQMjLWpoBInSAKF5IhERQw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228135 Archived-At: On Fri 03 Aug 2018, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andy Moreton >> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 15:05:56 +0100 >> >> > Any idea how come these errors don't happen in the 64-bit MinGW64 >> > build? They use the same headers, so what is different that triggers >> > the errors only in the 32-bit build? >> >> They don't happen in the 32bit MinGW (mingw.org) build on master either. >> >> I assume that something got fixed on the master branch after the bignum >> branch was created, and that the bignum branch has not been rebased >> since then. If I apply the following from master to the bignum branch then a 32bit MinGW build succeeds: 024d20f81e ("Fix compilation with mingw.org's MinGW 5.x headers") bd52f37cae ("Fix last change: only MinGW runtime 5.0.2 and later needs that.") > OK, let's wait until bignum is merged, and take it from there. Yes, that will fix it. AndyM