From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via help-gnu-emacs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 20:46:21 +0200 Message-ID: <86ef45s076.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <20190515210924.sijzy6mnpgzkt4gm@Ergus> <83ftpecwu1.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516161408.4dov3dwk5h4yoizn@Ergus> <838sv6cmwt.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516202327.5cgy2s4kppy3ahxa@Ergus> <871s0yqg2i.fsf@telefonica.net> <3210C8E9-7A74-47D6-81A0-470948E6D09C@gmail.com> <87r28xq0j1.fsf@telefonica.net> <20190517055202.ted62gt6hqcip7xt@Ergus> <83mujlbgjh.fsf@gnu.org> <20190517123551.vumasyoyr5bv5voq@Ergus> <835zq9b4vi.fsf@gnu.org> <86lfym1v3d.fsf@zoho.eu> <83imtqwlq6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="26623"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 07 21:37:30 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hZKg4-0006fa-C0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 21:37:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51872 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hZKg2-0003MH-SR for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 15:37:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55575) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hZJst-0001rw-17 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 14:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hZJsn-00016h-FM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 14:46:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=33534 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hZJsj-00011j-KS for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 14:46:31 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hZJsh-000Ggm-BE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 20:46:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:GPoXJrT8gfdUhRu/iJUhYeL66BY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120813 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Vim I have here weighs in at 24MB, so your > Vim is not really a full package. Both sizes refer to compressed packages. The packs rely one other things, which rely on other things, and ultimately everything relies on the whole computer, so I suppose Emacs and Vim are actually equally big. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal