From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Other details about completion. Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 10:39:16 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86ee29pawb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <86r16g92v5.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20220401202425.jfrwqmkm3ffmcm5h@Ergus> <20220404193501.adojhz7uvvaoq4sj@Ergus> <86czhw4oqr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4E8D9AEF-4D7A-4B11-822F-8D0911964A05@aol.com> <86bkxfibdo.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20220405232013.5y5jnr4ykzqgxqla@Ergus> <86a6cyiqlt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20220406132108.evlofp5l3krsl5h7@Ergus> <86sfqqduon.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20220406181339.iubahj6fviq3fyqv@Ergus> <86o81eawnv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <91135A5B-17B9-4B1A-AFB9-40D2656313DE@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10877"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 07 10:24:00 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ncNQt-0002iC-B5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 10:23:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47270 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ncNQr-0006T9-WC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 04:23:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ncNLU-0003kW-Gj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 04:18:24 -0400 Original-Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::221]:60577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ncNLS-0001cl-7F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 04:18:24 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD2DE240006; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 08:18:16 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <91135A5B-17B9-4B1A-AFB9-40D2656313DE@aol.com> (Ergus's message of "Wed, 06 Apr 2022 22:34:00 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::221; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay1-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287876 Archived-At: >> Do you mean addition step is needed where first C-g/ESC will clear >> the suffix, then another C-g/ESC will exit the minibuffer? > > We need a simple handy way to restore the mini-buffer as it was before > the navigation attempt... > > Maybe, let's look more at zsh and similes... That's already tested to > be intuitive so we don't need to reinvent the wheel and their users > already know. C-g in the completions buffer closes the completions window, then the second C-g in the minibuffer exits the minibuffer. So C-g in the minibuffer could be two-step as well: first C-g closes the completions window and clears the suffix, second C-g exits the minibuffer. >>> 2) In tabular navigation the down arrow always goes to the first column >>> which is wrong; maybe it should use next-line or line-move instead of >>> forward-line? >> >> This is what I tried first, but byte-compiler complained next-line >> is only for interactive use. > > Then it should probably be line-move but forward-line goes to column zero. Neither of them wraps to the beginning like next-completion does. This means we need a new command next-completion-vertical.