From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Missing snprintf in ucrt mingw + vc-refresh in find-file hook?
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:34:34 +0200
Message-ID: <86eddhqxx1.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <DU2PR02MB101097C2B42C7727BF1C6FB0896482@DU2PR02MB10109.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <6aed5106-b78c-49f1-8caa-a7f9d34c161b@gutov.dev>
 <DU2PR02MB1010972EC939E6322B3EBE41A96482@DU2PR02MB10109.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <207528e2-6bec-436e-8868-8e7b707133f6@gutov.dev> <86y1bpr5ka.fsf@gnu.org>
 <63a4aea1-b757-469b-8653-f634f9e88543@gutov.dev> <86mss5qyti.fsf@gnu.org>
 <eab5bce3-3f36-4f3b-b27d-7e798a9b6b58@gutov.dev>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="8949"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: arthur.miller@live.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 12 20:35:44 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1rZc5g-00024N-B1
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:35:44 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1rZc4m-0003VT-F7; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:34:49 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1rZc4h-0003LB-Fs
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:34:43 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1rZc4e-000797-Je; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:34:42 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=CSenhalppd+fhFEfE4pmknm+KvkfBTB2rhcZOIirdCk=; b=qnJoANQ+ptLt
 ULIY6s3/dNeRLalju/RxOz+9iljeNpuP+SOXe9woi4ZYthTAtGkNJ/oFHcJZx0nE1bVZ3TI5IOOeu
 +kwxFe3rVmdiRC8xXdlSGHQKxQpXk+ARztglwN8gGo3AN/KB7K2Ctv+Tc/n5foOFZMwaFORq8chZ4
 ZoBn6ukeqYWx5g40YrpWCHZQaoQtfDX5MyUAuoxHtM2esydIAvvUC386AvJFP3uFIbbPqTBXiQgdE
 fLcCo65kk1VJM0eyBc3Yr8jaui5vPc6NnlfH3ktLLjsFLn9E7qGJX8iPLEYSZ/oFTygeuS+t1XcMx
 vGLMFxVUkzXy3sXdgdI6cw==;
In-Reply-To: <eab5bce3-3f36-4f3b-b27d-7e798a9b6b58@gutov.dev> (message from
 Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:25:33 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316150
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/316150>

> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:25:33 +0200
> Cc: arthur.miller@live.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
> 
> Either way, perhaps Arthur can support the claim about "a quite 
> expensive call" with some numbers from his machine.

Yes, some data would be welcome.  Perhaps there are some other factors
at work there.