From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Scholtes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#8025: 24.0.50; vc-bzr does not perform initial commit Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:00:22 -0700 Message-ID: <86d3macb9l.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86hbc9yscs.fsf@gmail.com> <4D6D1CA3.4050307@gmail.com> <83zkpey962.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299045759 13831 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2011 06:02:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 06:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 8025@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 02 07:02:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Puf8p-0006bE-Lb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 07:02:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53490 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Puf8p-0000Vz-08 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:02:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48839 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Puf8i-0000Vu-Ek for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:02:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Puf8h-0008RI-Dt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:02:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:50381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Puf8e-0008QU-D0; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:02:20 -0500 Original-Received: by vxc38 with SMTP id 38so6126432vxc.0 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:02:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=3HRRSKHUBr+zB7l+O+SblHZ1DP2I6d7UmkA7Fc+N8po=; b=kdYPPDfbZVTJ4RmPzZmTZmh5vJzChhAV/+L/rCzo7UzWTnH9JjQhO80PIxjGVv/R5F MJOjiMaQawLl7KrEv2EbfOpO8XNpnqD1HA6wJHFy7sgvkmcMZNTi4dvYm2N6ZpflFzC5 iP8pO/IXeBlYQPpVo0IKHCQM73m0m8zoBfv+w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=mRkDXIHRD74hF8juwEIMEpWY8pZrwAgxAWOGXtdAdal2yyDpMy0+auP5AHVJ3S6AEd XIiju8Pb7be6++4Pu7DAVLkmIzhlTs1QEmSat0JpKP97QuLoP7lhEy3umgIU3n8PZ4fp 4u73ugK0i3bh5QuIW8Ybp8qp2X3kcKR2ZEmTQ= Original-Received: by 10.52.178.33 with SMTP id cv1mr1317086vdc.46.1299045627961; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:00:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (71-208-180-213.hlrn.qwest.net [71.208.180.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b26sm445814vby.3.2011.03.01.22.00.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:00:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:31:46 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.220.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136705 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Also remember there is the annoying bzr locking issue. Eg doing `bzr up' > renders `bzr status' unusable so long as it is running. So it is not > just the speed of the status command that is a factor. OK, but one could argue that this is a bzr issue and should be fixed there and not "dealt-with" in emacs. Do you know if it has been reported to the bzr team? > Personally I'd like to see the heuristic stay (based on zero real data). In general, I have no problem with that. As long as it works. ;)