From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Suggestions for 1L computer to run Emacs 2019 Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 21:29:04 +0100 Message-ID: <86d0o01zan.fsf@zoho.eu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="165152"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 09 21:29:56 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsZG7-000gqo-Tn for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 21:29:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49541 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsZG6-000489-U8 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 15:29:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsZFS-00045v-Be for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 15:29:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsZFR-0008Uk-Bg for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 15:29:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=52466 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsZFR-0008TE-4Z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 15:29:13 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsZFO-000fu2-L2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 21:29:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:SB7961dmbuMJa9nKatrziIMoR/Q= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:119307 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> If, indeed, Apple does privacy protection >> from the likes of AMI, Apple's justification >> for wanting to protect "their" devices >> is understandable. > > I don't know what "AMI" stands for here > (searching online finds way too many possible > interpretations of this acronym). AMI = Accessible Media Inc, a Canadian non-profit broadcaster and media platform, operating digital television and audio channels primarily for blind and partially sighted Canadians. [1] Here is an article on Apple from AMI, "AMI Insiders discuss Apple's iPhone 7": The internet is polarized like a pair of high-end sunglasses over Apple's decision to eliminate the conventional headphone jack from the new iPhone 7. [2] What a bummer! The internet is polarized like a pair of high-end sunglasses, and I haven't even heard about it, despite my trusted old pair of high-frequency amplifiers! But if the "conventional headphone jack" is the traditional 3.5mm audio port then that "sounds" like Apple alright - they probably want people to buy new and more expensive stuff. And if that source is correct, they already got half the internet onboard! [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMI [2] https://www.ami.ca/ami-insiders-discuss-apples-iphone-7 -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573