From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 72b1379f079: Increase `emacs-lisp-docstring-fill-column` to 72 Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 10:53:22 +0200 Message-ID: <86cyte3p4t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <170687730547.552.9673193819426474611@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240202123506.0CEC7C0EFF5@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87mssjm0ac.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il36mevf.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il368cqh.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87a5oim1ql.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32466"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 03 09:53:50 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rWBmX-0008Fe-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 09:53:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWBm8-0001l5-Nn; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 03:53:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWBm7-0001kw-9M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 03:53:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rWBm7-0003xr-0C; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 03:53:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=xPFnuOzsDCoKF4ZSkfilwjEr3KcbAzxZVOH6GcgEztQ=; b=nhMx8cI38cQT M51gdLRuXvVntRahKP6+HN55DpX4M9lq2JdaKoAxYZGDHntDrtVVcDUUudJgdHNTpRPVkK25i8WF2 L37FsKP2S9xgna62PTf9IAAk6MoB+98clfnQJkpTbyqhGZBmmjizHWc7lEX1ACsw+fKqKjXiA4+Ay WIEIF2oZek5hD6BZNBRZwS+dxL7muBR+aleIpED7gN9VNwnnIhT/AIu8sjY1Pff4Yny9AjWPLsCfC VJ6Fu29J/zj0/ntFQAorHWZmHGmk4k/1hsk6Ilw9T+TAEE+nK/NCQg8+XbGmUEZFx8wZ+XF+B+FVL hcsr2PpK5Sc4cCXeBP252g==; In-Reply-To: <87a5oim1ql.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sat, 03 Feb 2024 15:43:46 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315799 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 15:43:46 +0800 > > What problems came of the old value of 64, so urgent that it was > necessary to install this change (which, let us not forget, affects > _all_ Emacs users) on such short notice? And what problems do you envision from the new value? > I'm less opposed to this change in itself than to how it was > fast-tracked into Emacs by one individual citing an inconclusive > discussion a year removed. I'm surprised that you are opposed to something that has close to no effect on the doc strings. It sounds like another bikeshedding to me.